For a summary of other relevant domestic provisions which are not mentioned below see the judgment in the case of Minasyan and Semerjyan v.

Having regard to the principles established in its case-law, the resulting amount should then be converted to current value to offset the effects of inflation (see Minasyan and Semerjyan v.

  Georgia , no. 25091/07, § 274, 26   April 2011 , and Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no.   17247/13, § 157, 26   May 2020 ). 43.

plans des différents secteurs, ainsi que des relevés altimétriques produits par les parties qu'ont été à tort classés en zone agricole 4,6 ha situés sur la presqu'île d'Aspretto, 113 ha dans l'anse de Minaccia

Turkey , no. 15028/09, §§ 30-36, 23 June 2015; and Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no. 17247/13, §§ 93-94, 26 May 2020). 55 .

case examined by the courts of general jurisdiction, the Government did not submit a single example of a domestic decision in which such a course of action had been successful (compare Makuchyan and Minasyan

  50375/07, § 92, 18 July 2019, and Makuchyan and Minasyan v.   Azerbaijan and Hungary , no. 17247/13, § 157, 26 May 2020). 49.

Armenia , no. 44068/07, §§ 78-81, 20 December 2011; Piruzyan , cited above, §§ 125-27; and Minasyan v. Armenia , no. 44837/08, §§   76-78, 8 April 2014).