: 21/01186 COUR D'APPEL DE LYON CHAMBRE SOCIALE B ARRÊT DU 22 MAI 2026 APPELANTE : S.A.S. [1] N° SIRET: 55 318 287 00032 [Adresse 1] [Localité 1] représentée par Me Mickaël

Italy, (dec.), no. 41877/98, 22.3.2001 ; The Municipal Section of Antilly v. France (dec.), no. 45129/98, ECHR 1999-VIII and Ayuntamiento de Mula v. Spain (dec.), no.

Iceland (dec.), no. 48281/18, 2 June 2022, and Haukur Sigurbjörn Magnússon v. Iceland (dec.), no. 6696/19, 2 June 2022.

Latvia (dec.), no.   9278/06, §   34, 6 March 2012, and Bakal and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no.   8243/08, 5   June 2012). 8.

    Under Article 6 of Legislative Decree no.

Russia (dec.), no.   76737/01, 16 October 2003). Thus, for instance, in Radchikov v. Russia ((dec.), no.

  Lithuania (dec.), no. 37193/97, 20 April 1999). The Court considers that the applicant’s widow has a legitimate interest to maintain the case in his stead. 2.

Nos. 11192/84, dec. 14.5.87, D.R. 52 p. 227, 12015/86, D.R. 57 p. 108 and 24841/94 dec. 30.11.94).

The remuneration of such trustees is governed by a   decree of the Minister of Justice (Decree no. 526/2004 Coll.), which also entered into force on the same day.

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 19621/02 by Michal

In the absence of any specific information from the parties on the point, the Court assumed that the basis for the interference was the Minister of Justice’s decree of 24 November 1997.

En premier lieu, aux termes de l'article L. 2172-2 du code de la commande publique : " Les collectivités publiques soumises à l'obligation de décoration des constructions publiques passent les marchés

.), 21727/08, 20 January 2009; Kemevuako v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65938/09, § 22, 1 June 2010; Çetin   v.

  Concerning the parliamentary election, the CEC passed another decree requiring electoral precincts to publish preliminary lists of voters and obliging voters to go there to check that their names

Furthermore, the Austrian Supreme Court had duly made use of the control mechanism provided for in European Union law by asking the CJEU for a preliminary ruling (contrast the position in Michaud v.

'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 71379/14 Mikhail

France [GC] or Michaud v. France ).

Russia (dec.), no. 3040/03, 15 May 2007; Fedosov v. Russia (dec.), no. 42237/02, 5   January 2007; Nikishina v. Russia (dec.), no. 45665/99, 12 September 2000; and Wong v.

    The Court accepts that Mr Michail Angelos Pappas and Ms   Evrydiki   Prapopoulou (Papa) have a legitimate interest in pursuing the application in the late applicant’s stead.