Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD001009213
8 février 2018
8 février 2018
the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 21588/12, 3 March 2015).
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68427-68895
28 septembre 1999
28 septembre 1999
Procedure and composition of the Court The application was lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 17 March 1995.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161744
3 mars 2016
3 mars 2016
On 7 March 2013 the applicant was arrested and taken to the Ministry of National Security.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019DEC006729901
19 octobre 2004
19 octobre 2004
In the finding of 11 December 2002 the Constitutional Court formally considered only the period after the finding of 1 June 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316DEC002073715
16 mars 2021
16 mars 2021
He claimed that on one of those occasions he had handed over twelve drawings by Marc Chagall and six valuable antiquarian books.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205600
28 septembre 2020
28 septembre 2020
She was indicted on 15 March 2013 and charged with fraud by abuse of position ( umboðssvik ) on five counts, which concerned loans granted by the bank to two companies prior to the financial crisis.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245916
6 octobre 2025
6 octobre 2025
74644/01, § 35, 7 March 2006)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245287
11 septembre 2025
11 septembre 2025
58428/10, § 194, 27 March 2014; and Kartoyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 9418/13 and 2 others, §§ 74 and 79-80, 19 October 2021)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158428
8 octobre 2015
8 octobre 2015
On 30 March 2011 the expert produced his report, finding that there was no causal link between the injuries sustained in the road accident and the applicant’s further diagnoses.
Source officielleciv3
6137227dcd580146773fd9f4
10 octobre 1995
10 octobre 1995
Jean-Paul YK..., 48 / de Mme Marie XD..., épouse YK..., demeurant ensemble ... le Bretonneux, 49 / de M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0907DEC007445601
7 septembre 2004
7 septembre 2004
Enforcement proceedings brought on 1 March 2000 On 1 March 2000 the applicant requested the Bratislava IV District Court to enforce a judgment, which had become final on 28 January 1998,
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204805
3 septembre 2020
3 septembre 2020
Having regard to the findings of the Court of General Jurisdiction of Yerevan in its judgment of 30 March 2018 as upheld in the final instance by the Court of Cassation on 12 December 2018
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159852
14 décembre 2015
14 décembre 2015
As regards the court’s argument that he had been wanted since 10 March 2013, the applicant noted that he had never been informed of the investigator’s decision of 10 March 2013 charging him with the criminal
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827DEC002854020
27 août 2024
27 août 2024
Her material findings, as set out in the Executive Summary of her report, may be summarised as follows: (a) On 2 March 2017 the applicant had sexually assaulted Ms Z. by placing his hand
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223729
9 mars 2023
9 mars 2023
11pt } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)36 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Selahattin Demirtaş (No. 2) against Turkey (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 March
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC006928210
15 septembre 2020
15 septembre 2020
Likewise, there is no indication that the courts did not provide reasons for their findings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC001607723
2 décembre 2025
2 décembre 2025
On 20 March 2015 the Inspectorate discontinued the proceedings against the applicant company, finding that the latter had, in the meantime, disposed of all the waste required for 2013 and
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD007643812
6 octobre 2016
6 octobre 2016
It eventually took place on 12, 14 and 20 March 2007. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208397
3 février 2021
3 février 2021
Supreme Court of Justice failed to conduct a public hearing or to give the applicant the opportunity to state its case orally and gave a new interpretation to the facts of the case, substituting the findings
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216080
10 février 2022
10 février 2022
By a High Court judgment of 10 October 2019, which became final on 12 March 2020, the applicant was convicted of, inter alia , attempted manslaughter, committed in July 2018.
Source officiellePage 7 sur 1230