Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231181
22 janvier 2024
22 janvier 2024
authorisation from the Public Health Agency, that it had been built in breach of the construction regulations which prohibited the placement of TDPs under residential buildings and that she suffered hearing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177872
22 septembre 2017
22 septembre 2017
The first hearing was held on 21 March 2016 and the applicant was present. She was also present at another hearing on 24 March 2016. The hearing started at 9 a.m. and lasted until 11.50 a.m.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0603DEC001957802
3 juin 2004
3 juin 2004
She further asserts under the same heading that the amount of compensation was insufficient reparation for her wrongful arrest and detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245931
9 octobre 2025
9 octobre 2025
The second, third and fourth applicants were helping to deliver the donations to the PFPA or to distribute them to the families.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0301DEC001357288
1 mars 1991
1 mars 1991
On 21 November 1984 (one week before the hearing) the Court rejected this request, finding no reason to depart from its previous ruling.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138898
6 novembre 2013
6 novembre 2013
nevertheless, given the high number of people sharing a cell, the solution is not sustainable; (iv) the drinking water is not available at all times, the hot water is not sufficient and, in winter, the heating
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1202DEC003969596
2 décembre 1999
2 décembre 1999
On 15 October 1993 the chimney of a heating plant located in P. and belonging to the State Agency of Agricultural Property, adjacent to the applicant’s horticultural farm, partly collapsed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1202DEC002969596
2 décembre 1999
2 décembre 1999
On 15 October 1993 the chimney of a heating plant located in P. and belonging to the State Agency of Agricultural Property, adjacent to the applicant’s horticultural farm, partly collapsed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0520DEC007420801
20 mai 2003
20 mai 2003
The hearing proceeded on 26 April 1999 in the applicant’s absence. The Court of Appeal gave judgment on 10 May 1999.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202DEC004030398
2 décembre 2003
2 décembre 2003
They further complain under the same heading about the refusal of the Court of Cassation to hold a hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1120DEC002969596
20 novembre 2001
20 novembre 2001
The subsequent hearing on the merits of the case was held on 13 September 1999.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0901DEC000090403
1 septembre 2005
1 septembre 2005
The first hearing before the Erzurum State Security Court was held on 2 November 2001.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC000423802
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
The applicant failed to appear before the court at several hearings during this time.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD001120019
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
SPAIN (Application no. 11200/19) JUDGMENT Art 6 (criminal) • Fair hearing • No breach of legal certainty in case-law concerning surcharge for late tax payment and default interest
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127JUD000067221
27 janvier 2026
27 janvier 2026
Fair hearing)
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000257509
20 juin 2019
20 juin 2019
Article 6 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] .
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD004430906
28 janvier 2020
28 janvier 2020
The judgment of 10 February 2006 reads as follows: “[The defendant] did not appear at the trial hearing, having been promptly and properly notified of the time and place of this hearing,
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD004213908
12 janvier 2016
12 janvier 2016
The Court reiterates that the right to a public hearing under Article 6 § 1 implies a right to an oral hearing at least before one instance, and the lack of a hearing before the first instance
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2001:414
12 juillet 2001
12 juillet 2001
. # Georg Heininger et Helga Heininger contre Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG. # Demande de décision préjudicielle: Bundesgerichtshof - Allemagne. # Protection des consommateurs - Démarchage à domicile
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD001097806
26 juillet 2018
26 juillet 2018
He requested that the hearing be adjourned. No reply followed. 8 . The District Court held the hearing on 28 January 2004 as planned.
Source officiellePage 7 sur 1853