CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

152 résultats pour « Elsie DALMAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD005547010

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2017

10 janvier 2017

Article 8, be in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia

Page 7 sur 8

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0630REP002247993

Admin. suprême

30 juin 1998

30 juin 1998

yarĸn hayali gibi üstelik   nazlĸdĸr   usludur   ince   bilgedir   biz ki ustasĸyĸz vatan sevmenin   umut   saklĸmĸzda olumsuz bayrak   kĸrmĸzĸ-kĸrmĸzĸ   dalga-dalgadĸr

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0311DEC006886401

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2004

11 mars 2004

They explained that the use of intermediaries was a “form of sham”, which entailed making a person appear in a legal document to be the holder of a right that was in fact held by someone else whose identity

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0831DEC002469704

Admin. suprême

31 août 2004

31 août 2004

In any event, he would not be forced to return to the same village in Iran where his in-laws are living but could settle somewhere else in the country.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622DEC001786803

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2004

22 juin 2004

applicant’s new relationship with a Swedish woman, the Government submitted that, if this relationship were to be taken into account under Article 8 of the Convention, it could not be considered a weighty element

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD002179408

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

France , 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198, and Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD003803012

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2015

23 avril 2015

Article 8, be in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000178508

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

He added that the domestic authorities and the Government had given too much weight to his conviction and the criminal charges brought against him, while disregarding all other elements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD002800512

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2015

7 juillet 2015

The court noted that the applicants had been served with a notice of the exequatur order and had exhausted pleas available in law in that respect ( hanno esperito le impugnazioni previste dalla legge )

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0303JUD003537697

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2000

3 mars 2000

The fifth applicant, Mrs Dagmar Rýdlová, born in 1932, is resident in Prague, Czech Republic. The sixth applicant, Mrs Eva Kaňoková, born in 1935, is resident in Prague, Czech Republic.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD001202009

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2013

16 avril 2013

  France , 26   September 1997, § 34, Reports 1997-VI; Dalia v.   France , 19   February 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-I; Boultif v.   Switzerland , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD005025299

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2006

31 janvier 2006

be determined whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, that is to say justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221JUD002694506

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

France , 20   February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; and Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ I). 69.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD001975013

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2022

23 juin 2022

However, such issue was dealt with in detail in a dissenting opinion by Judge Dagmar Lastovecká, to whose opinion the applicant refers and at the same time elaborates on some of these arguments below.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD004641099

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2006

18 octobre 2006

Article 8, be in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD006028609

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

However, the Court has previously held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children or between adult siblings unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence ( Slivenko

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD001715311

Admin. suprême

28 août 2012

28 août 2012

  11–12, §   27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, §   38).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD004393618

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2020

22 décembre 2020

France (no. 52273/16 and 4 others, §§   43-44, 25 June 2020) the Court held that nationality is an element of a person’s identity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC003494306

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2008

3 juin 2008

A submission can only be considered to have been relied upon if a specific circumstance has been emphasised as an element in the reasoning for the party’s litigation claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC006304911

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2013

17 décembre 2013

    By a letter dated 6 June 2011 the CCPS repeated that the relevant law did not have retrospective effect and informed them that the subject was considered closed unless they had new elements

Source officielle