CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 324 résultats pour « Derrendinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305DEC002960105

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2019

5 mars 2019

He alleged before the domestic courts that the use of different weighing methods depending on different fields of study had been discriminatory and unfair. 12.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 217

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12885

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2020

30 juin 2020

appeal, pointing out that no appeal lay with such an administrative judgment as the relevant legislation had meanwhile been amended to raise the threshold on eligibility for an appeal on points of law depending

Source officielle
TJ

Référés Cabinet 3

66964173f5112d8edd058727

T. Judiciaire

12 juillet 2024

12 juillet 2024

LECOQ, Vice-présidente en charge des référés Greffier : Madame SOULIER, Greffière Débats en audience publique le : 14 Juin 2024 GROSSE : Le 12 Juillet 2024 à Me Alain CHETRIT à Me François DEFENDINI

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2577

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

  Variable standards should not apply to the competent “tribunal” depending on practical considerations, such as those invoked by the Government, namely the particular demographic situation in Iceland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4822

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2003

5 juin 2003

The district court rejected the representative’s claim on the ground that he was not a lawyer approved by a German court and had not been approved by the court as the applicant’s defending counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7294

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

Moreover, the amount of the fine applicable to that type of offence varied depending on the newspaper’s circulation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-552

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

  m of space depending on the type of cell, without counting furniture).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13506

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

Although the Convention did not precisely define the concept of “trade union” beyond a general indication that it was an association formed for the purpose of defending the interests of its members, most

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-40

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

That position might, however, be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law under Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10927

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

The applicant had not sought to replace the old spelling of her name by another but had wished to use either spelling depending on the circumstances.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180341

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2017

20 décembre 2017

    Did the applicant’s claim to have a part of 2,760 sq. m of the disputed land registered in the land register in his name depending on the final court decision of 29   January 2002 constitute

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3616

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2005

25 octobre 2005

Admissible under Articles 6 and 13 as to the applicant’s complaint that she had been denied the opportunity of defending herself during the proceedings at first instance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5012

Admin. suprême

6 février 2003

6 février 2003

Although the applicants had not been heard individually, associations defending the professional interests of lawyers had been heard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207526

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2020

9 décembre 2020

The first applicant is an association defending freedom of the press; the second applicant is a lawyer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1918

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

However, that method of compensation was not justified and could lead to unequal treatment between applicants, depending on the nature of the public works carried out by the public authorities, which was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2075

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

That position might be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law under the Act in line with the Convention requirements

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9882

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 1992

25 septembre 1992

  Merits Applicant not deprived of all means of defending himself: he could have tried to demonstrate that he had acted from necessity or as a result of unavoidable mistake - Court of Appeal had taken

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-578

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2011

29 mars 2011

licensing of broadcasters, accepted the principle of affording them different treatment to that of the print media, the application by the Court of Cassation of different provisions of the Constitution, depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10210

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

situation of Romania under the communist regime had to be taken into account, as did the fact that, in order to avoid a repetition of its past, the State had to be founded on a democracy capable of defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181008

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2018

25 janvier 2018

(b)     Following the Sürmene Cadastral Court’s decision of 23 March 2009, has it been possible for the applicant to dispose of any immovable property depending on the said title deed?

Source officielle