CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915JUD002742205
15 septembre 2015
In this connection he requested a medical report establishing that he was not able to hold a gun with his right hand.
Page 7 sur 11
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD004304405
14 avril 2015
Furthermore, during the operation a hole was opened in the walls of the prison by a digger which then tore off the applicant Mr Saçılık’s left arm from above his elbow.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD004118806
19 avril 2011
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD000082205
16 décembre 2008
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of each of the above mentioned sets of proceedings; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD004123004
23 octobre 2007
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0301JUD004767699
1 mars 2005
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention in the case of Beet (47676/99); 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1121JUD002730895
21 novembre 2000
Holds unanimously that it is not necessary to determine whether there has been a breach of Article 5 of the Convention; 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629JUD002245702
29 juin 2006
57576/00, 3 October 2002, and Barbača v. Croatia (dec.), no. 63779/00, 18 September 2003). 32.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD004186218
30 juin 2020
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Declares the applications admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD001371211
6 octobre 2016
that domestic remedies should be exhausted, including the option of reopening the proceedings, does not apply to just satisfaction claims submitted to the Court under Article 41 (see, for instance, Barberà
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004828611
30 mai 2017
the Court reiterates that as a rule, the requirement that domestic remedies should be exhausted does not apply to just satisfaction claims submitted to the Court under Article 41 (see, for instance, Barberà
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0208JUD007561701
8 février 2007
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the length of proceedings; 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523JUD003257003
23 mai 2006
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention; 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223JUD002897504
23 février 2010
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention on account of Mr Kałucki's death; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0827JUD005574716
27 août 2019
The applicant holds the perpetual utile dominium of an apartment in Depiro Street Sliema. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711JUD001322903
11 juillet 2006
Holds unanimously that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 2 of the Convention; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD005099608
5 juin 2014
In Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710DEC002294624
10 juillet 2025
The Court sees no reason to hold otherwise.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD007691801
14 décembre 2006
This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. ... 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD003755305
26 novembre 2013
In May 2003 the Kalvarija municipality issued a permit to hold a peaceful assembly in Kalvarija town, “near the marketplace”.