It considered that the applicant’s detention for the subsequent months was reasonable given that the criminal proceedings in his case had to start anew. 18.

  Mr Justice Gjølstad and Mr Justice Tjomsland voted in favour of rejection, while Mr Justice Bugge voted against.

    Article 163 of the Code read as follows:   “...The investigator starts the confrontation procedure by asking the participants whether they know each other and what their relationship

may request a statement of reasons for the delay.

In particular, it states that judges must not disclose the substance of such deliberations. 20 .

to what extent the risk of recidivism existing at the time is still present today.

While looking for work, some Vietnamese people had introduced him to H, who had provided him with accommodation, food and money.

It states that by a decision of 24 May 2004 the Office had granted Ms C.

Some of the decisions also contained a statement that the applicants’ state of health and family situation had been duly noted.

Twenty-one statements were taken from prisoners in March and May 1996. Eighteen prison officers were interviewed and statements were taken from eight of them in March 1996.

On the contrary, the State was ready to start working on the settlement of the issue at the domestic level first.

It appears from a reading of the transcripts that there were frequent interruptions at the start of the appellant’s evidence.

most probably been administered while Mr Dimitrov had been upright or slightly bending.

Certain provisions of the State Fees Act ( Закон за държавните такси ) were applicable as well. 22.

    On 17 June 2009 the Mayor’s office offered the applicant a possibility to start negotiations.

On 26 November 2004 the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s cassation appeal on the ground that the flat in question was in State ownership and was in the possession of the applicant not as her

He stressed that the legislation of other member States of the Council of Europe allowed an accused to defend himself in person.

The judge observed that the applicant was suspected of having committed offences while acting as part of an organised group and that the pre-trial investigation was still at its initial stage.

It follows that the period to be taken into consideration by the Court starts on 5 November 1997.