CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0108DEC001783991
8 janvier 1992
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS Mrs.G. H. THUNE SirBasil HALL MM.F. MARTINEZ RUIZ C.L. ROZAKIS Mrs.J. LIDDY MM.L. LOUCAIDES J.-C. GEUS M.P. PELLONPÄÄ B. MARXER Mr. H.C.
Page 69 sur 462
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0113DEC001841891
13 janvier 1992
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS Mrs.G.H. THUNE MM.F. MARTINEZ L. LOUCAIDES J.-C. GEUS Mr. K. ROGGE, Secretary to the Second Chamber.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2641
12 juin 2007
proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Refusal of legal aid for a claimant who was unable to pay the procedural costs for bringing an action – procedural guarantees afforded by the domestic legal-aid scheme
ECLI:CEDH:002-4230
27 juillet 2004
The legislative scheme was thus considered to lack the necessary safeguards for avoiding discrimination and for guaranteeing adequate judicial control of the restrictions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308DEC003951298
8 mars 2011
Similarly, their property was subsequently made subject to the special lease scheme”, the system of “controlled rent” and restrictions imposed under the 2001 Act, which are described at length both in
ECLI:CEDH:002-284
13 décembre 2011
endure a reasonable and commensurate reduction rather than the total suspension of their entitlements or if the legislature had afforded them a transitional period within which to adjust to the new scheme
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168612
19 octobre 2016
On 26 June 2007 the town of Archangelsk transfer the title to the room to Mel. under a privatisation scheme.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1525
19 mai 2009
They were prevented from appealing to the Supreme Court – where legal representation was compulsory – after the lawyers who had been appointed to assist them under the legal-aid scheme declined to act
ECLI:CEDH:002-1527
ECLI:CEDH:001-182737
6 avril 2018
SALENTO ENERGY S.R.L. against Italy and NUOVO SOLE S.R.L. against Italy lodged on 17 April 2015 and 4 August 2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE From 2005 until 2013, a total of five incentives schemes
Cour d'Appel
6253ccedbd3db21cbdd91b91
21 octobre 2014
Jacques Henri AUCHE de la SCP AUCHE HEDOU, AUCHE-AVOCATS ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat postulant assisté de Me Emmanuelle MASSOL, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER substituant la SCP SCHEUER
Rétention Administrative
6322c110e2d0c6fcb0c3c9b3
23 août 2022
RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE Metz ORDONNANCE DU 23 AOUT 2022 3ème prolongation Nous, Clarisse SCHIRER, présidente de chambre agissant sur délégation de Monsieur
6322c112e2d0c6fcb0c3c9c1
26 août 2022
RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE METZ ORDONNANCE DU 26 AOUT 2022 1ère prolongation Nous, Clarisse SCHIRER, présidente de chambre agissant sur délégation de Monsieur
1ère Chambre
69fa6837cdc6046d47b799b1
9 janvier 2026
barreau de LORIENT, avocat postulant et Maître Julien FANEN, avocat au Barreau de QUIMPER, avocat plaidant Défenderesse, MAGISTRAT : Madame KASBARIAN Juge de la mise en état GREFFIER : Madame SCHEURER
69fa683dcdc6046d47b79a16
représentée par Maître Claire DARY de la SELARL LAURENT-DARY, avocats au barreau de LORIENT, avocats plaidant Défenderesse, MAGISTRAT : Madame KASBARIAN Juge de la mise en état GREFFIER : Madame SCHEURER
ECLI:CEDH:002-1113
16 février 2010
As his insurance scheme did not cover the cost and he lacked the necessary financial resources – a fact known to and accepted by the authorities – he had been unable to obtain the dentures.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0401DEC001506989
1 avril 1992
SCHERMERS H. DANELIUS Mme G.H. THUNE MM. F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001380488
13 mai 1992
ECLI:CEDH:002-11083
2 juin 2016
Thirdly, unlike the position in Vörður Ólafsson , there was a significant degree of involvement in and control of the scheme by public authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001433688