CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

15 248 résultats pour « Llibourty »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD003368817

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

or detained persons are entitled to a review bearing upon the procedural and substantive conditions which are essential for the “lawfulness”, in the sense of the Convention, of their deprivation of liberty

Page 69 sur 763

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002681915

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD004228206

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2022

13 janvier 2022

    The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). In applications nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD000420719

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

)(1) of the Criminal Procedure Law ( Kriminālprocesa likums ), as in force at the material time, provided that detainees, suspects and accused persons who had been subjected to deprivation of their liberty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD000114324

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

or detained persons are entitled to a review bearing upon the procedural and substantive conditions which are essential for the “lawfulness”, in the sense of the Convention, of their deprivation of liberty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD003134013

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see   Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova   [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD004096213

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2020

5 novembre 2020

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0901JUD004973412

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2016

1 septembre 2016

  Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ... ... ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917JUD002566409

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD001358211

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2021

2 décembre 2021

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD001467617

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2022

6 septembre 2022

    In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia , the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD001380420

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2022

15 décembre 2022

    The applicant complained of deprivation of liberty. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0622JUD007745012

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2017

22 juin 2017

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD004004520

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2022

27 octobre 2022

They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 4 “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0114JUD003880012

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2016

14 janvier 2016

The investigator stated, without developing further, that if at liberty the applicant could influence the victim. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD005202308

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

He relied on Article 5 §   4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 4 “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD002859714

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2022

21 juin 2022

impression that it viewed detention not as a preventive measure but as something akin to a penalty which the applicant was to “serve”, which, in the Court’s opinion, negated the very essence of the right to liberty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318JUD004261319

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2025

18 mars 2025

    In determining whether the applicant was deprived of his liberty in accordance with Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, the Court notes that the applicant’s pre-trial detention was ordered in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD003158116

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

    Relying on Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complained that his right to liberty had been infringed as he had been unlawfully detained without any official record between 7

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD000707715

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

Résumé IA — à vérifier