The applicant asked these friends because he could trust them; Haj Salem was a respected businessman and Saeed Teryag had been to university and spoke English.

They had testified in general terms that the protesters, many of whom had been wearing UNSO armbands and had had their faces covered, had behaved violently. 41 .

He had come back only when he had needed more money. Every time he had come back, he had beaten the applicant.

He had complained about pain in a hip. She had examined him but had found no injuries on his hip. The applicant had had an injury on the fibrous part of his head.

Magomed had been in t-shirt, jeans, flip ‑ flops and a cap, his friends had had similar outfits. None of them had been armed.

The applicant stated in his complaint that he had not had an opportunity to study the case file after the investigation had been completed.

He had also indicated that he had had no complaints about the conduct of the police officers and that he had not asked his mother to complain on his behalf.

According to their statements, the applicant had tried to flee and they had arrested him when he had fallen down, using proportionate force. 9.

To avoid being shot N.P. had knelt, but A.A., thinking that his fellow officer had been wounded, had fired a shot in reply.

the recognition submitted directly afterwards by her husband; however, the applicant had not been informed of this move, and had had no possibility to object to it.

Two applicants had further complained that their dismissal had caused them health problems and emotional distress. They had omitted, however, to provide details on those issues.

The first applicant, who had been found to have had large sums of unexplained money passing through his bank accounts, had failed to give any credible explanation for these anomalies.

The division president had been perfectly aware of the interest of the press in following the trial and the public interest in being informed about it despite the restrictions that had had to be imposed

The behaviour of the applicants had intimidated the employees and students and had disrupted the normal functioning of the educational establishment.

Even supposing that she had given such permission, there was nothing to suggest that she had done so in a free and informed manner.

Law – Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3: The Government had argued that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies.

Immediately after the confession had been obtained, the crime had been reclassified as, and the applicant had been charged with, murder.

The District Court held that the defendants had not shown that they had paid the purchase price.

Law – Article 34: The Court, of its own motion, had raised the issue whether the applicant had been subjected to intimidation which had amounted to a hindrance to the effective exercise of his right of