Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147737
8 octobre 2014
8 octobre 2014
He fully acknowledged his guilt but needed medical treatment to alleviate his severe pain, treatment which was unavailable in prison.
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2637608-2868320
9 février 2009
9 février 2009
He entered a not guilty plea. The Riga Regional Court found him guilty and imposed an immediate six-year custodial sentence.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3070988-3398372
18 mars 2010
18 mars 2010
His comments, including a promise to arrest the applicant, could have been construed as confirming his belief that Mr Kuzmin was guilty of the alleged offence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC002702718
12 décembre 2023
12 décembre 2023
The Court further observes that in its decision, the Court of Appeal mentioned that the applicant company “was found guilty” (see paragraph 4 above).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1019DEC003686397
19 octobre 1998
19 octobre 1998
It took into account that it would have been improbable that officials had been bribed into releasing her, had she actually been found guilty of adultery.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530JUD003245196
30 mai 2000
30 mai 2000
claim on the grounds that "she was not deemed more likely to be innocent than guilty of the conduct with which she was charged.”
Source officielle2e chambre civile
68e89640f14914fb075ebccb
9 octobre 2025
9 octobre 2025
[E] [U] [Adresse 3] Représentant : Me Sylvain RECHE de la SCP SCP RECHE-GUILLE MEGHABBAR, avocat au barreau de CARCASSONNE Mme [X] [M] épouse [U] [Adresse 3] Représentant : Me Sylvain RECHE de la
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2586726-2809224
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
The applicants submitted that, no longer able to resist ill-treatment, they signed self-incriminating statements on 7 and 8 November 2000 in which they fully recognised their guilt of having committed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC001030903
8 janvier 2008
8 janvier 2008
On 28 February 2002 the trial court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to three years and nine months’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158989
6 novembre 2015
6 novembre 2015
The court further rejected the applicant’s argument that he had not sought the attendance of those witnesses, stating that their presence had been necessary to prove the applicant’s guilt, as he had not
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177765
20 septembre 2017
20 septembre 2017
V.D. had pleaded guilty to all the charges.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC003746604
26 mai 2009
26 mai 2009
He also requested the court to discontinue the proceedings against him for lack of proof of his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004DEC006872101
4 octobre 2005
4 octobre 2005
the court stated inter alia : “The nature of the offence and what would ordinarily constitute a fair punishment ( straffvärdet ) for the offence of which ..., [the applicant], ... ha[s] been found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002509594
16 janvier 1996
16 janvier 1996
The Commission recalls that, following the discontinuation of criminal proceedings, only statements which reflect the opinion that the person concerned is guilty, and not
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3132514-3474016
11 mai 2010
11 mai 2010
On 5 April 2000 the court found Mr Versini guilty as charged, gave him a six-month suspended prison sentence and ordered him to arrange for the publication and public display of the judgment; he was also
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115906
12 décembre 2012
12 décembre 2012
Offices, respectively, delivered rulings refusing to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers allegedly involved in the applicant’s ill-treatment for the lack of evidence of their guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012DEC000792304
12 octobre 2006
12 octobre 2006
The trial On 4 November 2003 the Snezhinsk Town Court found the applicant guilty of aggravated robbery and sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193413
29 avril 2019
29 avril 2019
The court found the applicant guilty of “minor disorderly acts”, an offence under Article 173 of the Code on Administrative Offences and sentenced him to three days’ administrative detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199536
25 novembre 2019
25 novembre 2019
On 10 April 2017 the Tverskoy District Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to a fine in the amount of 15,000 Russian roubles (RUB).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0108DEC001534689
8 janvier 1993
8 janvier 1993
- among which 470.000 guilders for lawyers' fees - on the basis of Section 591 (a) para. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Source officiellePage 69 sur 692