AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231579
16 février 2024
16 février 2024
In particular, on 24 February 2012 several assets owned by the applicant – including movable and immovable properties, the shares of her company, and her bank accounts – were seized by the preliminary
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56212
24 avril 2003
24 avril 2003
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)55 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 February
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55574
9 novembre 1993
9 novembre 1993
Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Crémieux case delivered on 25 February
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55668
15 décembre 1995
15 décembre 1995
Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Tumminelli case delivered on 27 February
Source officielleChambre 1-9
69cf6aaacdc6046d47f4ae25
2 avril 2026
2 avril 2026
Rôle N° RG 25/08037 N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7J-BO6W6 [G] [R] C/ URSSAF PACA CURITÉ SOCIALE ET D'ALLOCATIONS FAMILIALES PACA Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me Lionel FEBBRARO
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925JUD003719197
25 septembre 2001
25 septembre 2001
Ferrari Bravo , Mr Gaukur Jörundsson , Mr R. Türmen , Mr B. Zupančič , Mr T. Panţîru , Mr R. Maruste , judges , and Mr M.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68461-68929
18 février 1999
18 février 1999
GERMANY In judgments delivered at Strasbourg on 18 February 1999 in the cases of Waite and Kennedy v. Germany (application no. 26083/94) and Beer and Regan v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412DEC003981098
12 avril 2001
12 avril 2001
Ferrari Bravo , Mr Gaukur Jörundsson , Mr R. Türmen , Mr C. Bîrsan , Mr J. Casadevall , Mr R. Maruste , judges , and Mr M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC002859203
21 septembre 2010
21 septembre 2010
On 28 February 2003, at 2 p.m., for the first time since his arrest on 19 February 2003, the applicant was allowed to talk to his defence counsel.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0427DEC004585199
27 avril 2000
27 avril 2000
On 17 February 1996 the applicant submitted a claim for widow’s benefits (widow’s payment and widowed mother’s allowance) to the Benefits Agency.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110114
7 février 2012
7 février 2012
On 5 February 2001 another article was published with the title “ Corruption within the County Inspectorate ”.
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2432233-2626382
21 juillet 2008
21 juillet 2008
Greece (no. 15001/06), judgment of 21 February 2008. Mariettos and Mariettou v. Greece (no. 17755/06), judgment of 21 February 2008. Tót v.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD001791215
24 janvier 2023
24 janvier 2023
The Government’s version of the events of 20 February 2014 21 .
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176045
10 juillet 2017
10 juillet 2017
In a judgment of 7 February 2012 ( Al Husin v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154773
15 avril 2015
15 avril 2015
By a judgment of 5 February 2009 the Iaşi District Court allowed the applicants’ action. The Iaşi Mayor’s Office appealed against the judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152946
16 février 2015
16 février 2015
On 21 February 2012 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s complaints as ill-founded.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-71148
26 octobre 2005
26 octobre 2005
font-size:12pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Resolution ResDH(2005)92 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 26 February
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220230
26 septembre 2022
26 septembre 2022
However, in a judgment of 24 February 2003, final in 2005, the Pleven District Court declared that it had been an ancestor of the applicant who had owned that land before the nationalisation, and that
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56035
17 décembre 2001
17 décembre 2001
margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2001)162 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 February
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC000555917
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
By a letter dated 10 February 2022 sent to the applicant’s last known address, the applicant’s potential heirs were notified that the application had been restored to the Court’s list of cases.
Source officiellePage 69 sur 2955