Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2302607_20250306
6 mars 2025
6 mars 2025
Bohn
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2303577_20250220
20 février 2025
20 février 2025
Pour expédition conforme, Le greffier, C Bohn
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2204767_20250219
19 février 2025
19 février 2025
Bohn
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7170
17 octobre 2000
17 octobre 2000
Turkey - 24669/94 Judgment 17.10.2000 [Section I] Article 3 Inhuman treatment Alleged ill-treatment by the police: friendly settlement The applicants, both journalists, claimed that they had been beaten
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2408139_20250117
17 janvier 2025
17 janvier 2025
Bohn
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2255
26 février 2008
26 février 2008
Moreover, before deciding on the appeal, both the administrative authority and the court had visited the applicants’ property to form their own opinion about the noise level and had found that although
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2914201-3225482
30 octobre 2009
30 octobre 2009
Both were subsequently placed in social care homes for individuals with psychiatric problems, Mr Stanev in the Pastra care home and Mr Mitev in a care home in Pravda.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC003617104
15 novembre 2011
15 novembre 2011
On 29 April 2010 both lawyers signed in acknowledgment of receipt but did not respond to the letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1101
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
Both these schools refused to register with the “MRT” authorities, as this would have meant having to use the Cyrillic script and the “MRT” curriculum.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171238
17 janvier 2017
17 janvier 2017
Both applicants are Slovak nationals. They are represented before the Court by Ms I. Lenčéšová, a lawyer practising in Nitra.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004229309
12 juin 2018
12 juin 2018
The applicant in both cases, Ms Tsitsino Botchorishvili, is a Georgian national, who was born in 1946 and lives in Tbilisi. She was represented before the Court by Mr D.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10308
13 novembre 2014
13 novembre 2014
Both men were convicted of war crimes. H. was also convicted of complicity in torture.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311DEC001673105
11 mars 2021
11 mars 2021
The applicants’ complaints in both applications under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, concerning their inability to recover possession of their property nationalised under the former communist regime and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413DEC002392513
13 avril 2021
13 avril 2021
The applicants, Ms Bogusława Napierała (the first applicant) and Mr Jerzy Kubica (the second applicant), both Polish nationals, were born in 1956 and 1928 respectively.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122558
19 juin 2013
19 juin 2013
Both applicants describe the overall conditions of their detention as follows: overcrowded cells, lack of natural light and lack of fresh air.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0202DEC004512721
2 février 2023
2 février 2023
The Court notes that the proceedings were complex, as both the applicant (who resided in the United States) and the defendant lived abroad, which affected both the first-instance court’s communication
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2117515-2245967
18 septembre 2007
18 septembre 2007
They were both released on bail in February 2003 when their application for appeal was still pending.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166725
26 août 2016
26 août 2016
Both maintained that the exhibition in question had been organised for purely sociological reasons, and that they had conducted interviews with the families of the deceased, which had also been included
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2731
3 mai 2007
3 mai 2007
The Court was thus satisfied that the aggregate of remedies provided by the Act in cases of excessively long pending proceedings was effective in the sense that they were in principle capable of both preventing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203743
20 juin 2020
20 juin 2020
On his partner’s death the applicant inherited D’s half of the house in which they had both lived.
Source officiellePage 69 sur 1534