CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2740799-3004962

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

  The Gelendzhik town prosecutor, acting on behalf of the Institute and the person who had been allocated the applicant’s flat (a Mr M), brought proceedings against Ms Batsanina and her husband to

Page 69 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC003069521

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

THE LAW The Court first notes that Mr Ostojić had died before the application was lodged on behalf of the applicants (the relevant date is set out in the appended table).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237365

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2024

11 septembre 2024

  22457/16, § 177, 2 February 2021; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.   47848/08, §§ 130 ss., ECHR 2014; and B. v. Romania (no. 2) , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14300

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

the municipality of Grande-Synthe of insufficient action by France to prevent climate change: inadmissible (incompatible ratione personae) Facts – In November 2018 the applicant, acting on his own behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226030

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

Is there a conflict of interests between the first applicant, who has brought an application on behalf of the third applicant, and the third applicant   (see T.A. and Others v. the Republic of Moldova

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926DEC004351702

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2006

26 septembre 2006

particular, that as the court had decided on the basis of the case-file, he had been deprived of his right to defend himself, submit evidence, put questions to the witnesses and have witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10893

Admin. suprême

11 février 2016

11 février 2016

Ukraine - 15509/12 Judgment 11.2.2016 [Section V] Article 34 Victim Standing of mother to make Article   3 complaint on behalf of her son who died while in detention: victim status upheld Article

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cad5bd3db21cbdd8c3da

Appel

21 mars 2008

21 mars 2008

Antoine MOREL, président de chambre, président, Mme Danielle DEMONT-PIEROT, conseillère, Mme Monique BEHARY-LAUL-SIRDER, conseillère, rapporteure, qui en ont délibéré.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC000552103

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2008

4 janvier 2008

  He claimed restitution on his behalf and on behalf of the second applicant, who had originally owned one fourth of the property, and three successors in title to the other original co-owners.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1203DEC003287696

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1996

3 décembre 1996

She complains on her own behalf and on behalf of her husband, her four children, her sister and her husband and their three children, all of whom live at the same address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC002709111

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

In particular, he complained that there had been no public hearing and that he could not examine witnesses on his behalf. THE LAW 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC003071921

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

THE LAW The Court firstly notes that Mr Simonović had died before the application was lodged on behalf of the applicants (the relevant date is set out in the appended table).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001981316

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

    On 23   July 2015 the District Court allowed an application by the applicant to have B. summoned to testify on his behalf but refused to summon V., M. and P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0303DEC001250986

Admin. suprême

3 mars 1988

3 mars 1988

  A bail application was made unsuccessfully on his behalf and he was again remanded in custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329JUD003298610

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2022

29 mars 2022

    After the second applicant’s death the first applicant, her son, had expressed his wish to pursue the proceedings on her behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD001607407

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

    It is common ground between the parties that the applicant was detained with a view to her extradition from Russia to Belarus.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1021JUD002901095

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2003

21 octobre 2003

The Supreme Court stated that in the present case the applicant bank had the capacity to be a party to the proceedings; another question was who could act on its behalf before the court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

Having regard to that conclusion, I am satisfied that the test proposed on behalf of the Attorney General that the life of the unborn could only be terminated if it were established that an inevitable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627DEC002649902

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

Having regard to that conclusion, I am satisfied that the test proposed on behalf of the Attorney General that the life of the unborn could only be terminated if it were established that an inevitable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518JUD005533900

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2006

18 mai 2006

The first one was to have a paternity claim lodged on behalf of the child by a court appointed guardian.

Source officielle