CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11430
21 mars 2017
Serbia - 52142/12 Judgment 21.3.2017 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Detention on the basis of a decision rendered by the Republic of Serbian Krajina: violation Facts – In 1994
Page 68 sur 763
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0717JUD002541607
17 juillet 2012
The applicant complained that his deprivation of liberty had been unlawful from 26 May 2005 to 15 November 2005.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628JUD006425116
28 juin 2022
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD001379520
10 novembre 2022
They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 4 “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD008168112
13 juin 2017
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0223JUD002132516
23 février 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD000188606
19 janvier 2016
Eight years’ deprivation of liberty in a correctional home would be appropriate.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD001676107
17 avril 2012
give rise to unjustified deprivation of liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0901JUD006154315
1 septembre 2020
He relies on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD001735916
6 mars 2025
Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant’s deprivation of liberty from 11.30 p.m. on 30 September 2015 to 3 p.m. on 3 October 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD007975016
15 décembre 2022
In many cases where detainees had not been informed of the reasons why they were deprived of their liberty, the Court has found that their right to appeal against their detention was deprived
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD002626913
1 décembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD006859611
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD006363416
18 octobre 2022
In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia , the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711JUD001434717
11 juillet 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD001906215
13 octobre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD005250220
8 juin 2023
or detained persons are entitled to a review bearing upon the procedural and substantive conditions which are essential for the “lawfulness”, in the sense of the Convention, of their deprivation of liberty
ADLC
ADLC:95-D-67
24 octobre 1995
relative à des pratiques mises en oeuvre par des entreprises de transport sanitaire lors de la passation d'un marché avec le centre hospitalier général Robert-Boulin de Libourne
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD002391116
11 avril 2024
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivation of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 84, ECHR 2016 (extracts), with further references). 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD004813916
14 septembre 2023