CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

56 941 résultats pour « Levelle »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198533

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2019

24 octobre 2019

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings were unfair because the benches of judges which convicted her both at first and last instance level failed to hear evidence

Page 68 sur 2848

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD004672699

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2002

9 avril 2002

    Provisions on determination of the level of command of the official language 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001287909

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2019

10 janvier 2019

security level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD001260503

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2009

21 juillet 2009

They alleged that the level of noise and pollution emitted by the cooperative exceeded a   tolerable level. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD001998919

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2023

12 janvier 2023

    The Court observes that the applicants’ victim status depends on whether the redress afforded to them at the domestic level was adequate and sufficient having regard to Article 41 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0518JUD001077106

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2017

18 mai 2017

of jurisdiction   5 years and 17 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   1,900     2738/07 30/12/2006 Georgiy Nikolayevich Yezerskiy 26/01/1953   25/02/1998   30/06/2006   8

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002257913

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2018

15 novembre 2018

19/06/1946 Radojánné NÉCZIN 29/07/1935 Sándorné PÁNCZÉL 17/05/1966 Lászlóné SIMON 14/01/1943 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest 11/11/2009   14/10/2013   3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 4 day(s) 1 level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC000357706

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2009

31 mars 2009

On 13 October, 21 October, 28 October, 26 November, 1 December and 5 December 2008 each of the applicants informed the Court, in writing, that the cases had been settled at the domestic level and that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC000303906

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2009

31 mars 2009

On 15 October, 7 November, 14 November and 12 December 2008 and 8   and 12 January 2009 each of the applicants informed the Court, in writing, that the cases had been settled at the domestic level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0930JUD000592820

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2021

30 septembre 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD004406515

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014JUD003550320

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2021

14 octobre 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD002486321

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD005292121

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2024

5 septembre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD001450025

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192854

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2019

3 avril 2019

The circumstances established during the examination of the case and the evidence presented before the court demonstrate that the level of air pollution in Lipetsk is high.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002403006

Admin. suprême

17 février 2009

17 février 2009

1 October 2008 1,080 € 280 € 1,360 € 3. 25084/06 Sonja NOVAKOVIČ 30 May 2006 28 August 2000   19 April 2006   five years and eight months at two levels of jurisdiction 6 October 2008 1,440 €

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC002792107

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

    On 10 April 2006 the applicant lodged an application with the Timişoara Court of First Instance seeking recognition of its right of representation at company level. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC001553906

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

On 1 October, 7 October, 13 October, 11 November and 9   December   2008 each of the applicants informed the Court, in writing, that the cases had been settled at the domestic level and that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513DEC000402203

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2008

13 mai 2008

2008 1,620€ 417.75€ 2,037.75€ 2 980/04 KUNŠEK Anton 6 years and 2 months for 3 levels of jurisdiction 18 February 2008 450€ 292.77€ 742.77€ 3 1247/04 JAŠAREVIČ Sladjana 5 years for 1 level of jurisdiction

Source officielle