CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
1ère chambre civile B
5fd9f025586a0130c1c0a0ac
29 octobre 2019
Sur la demande de nullité du contrat de prêt pour erreur sur la détermination de son objet A l'appui de cette demande, les appelants font valoir que le contrat de prêt aurait eu pour objet 'lacquisition
Page 68 sur 81
Pôle 6 - Chambre 4
5fdb1729bf349aabce542390
10 avril 2019
[N] suite à un dépôt de plainte puis lacitation directe pour harcèlement moral a eu pour effet une mise à l'écart de certains de ses collègues de travail, - que, suite à un couriel du 10 septembre 2012
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC004805315
8 juin 2021
Her lawsuit had been dismissed by the courts of all instances and most recently by the final decision of 22 April 2016 of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116561
14 janvier 2013
In its reply to the applicant’s lawsuit, the NDEA responded that the relocation of the residents from the applicant’s neighbourhood was conducted in connection with “the important State project” approved
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0613JUD004406802
13 juin 2006
On 29 September 2000 the District Court judge in charge of the lawsuit requested that the Regional Court remove her from the case as she felt biased as a result of the applicant’s written
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD005654710
26 juin 2012
On an unspecified date in 1998, the applicant lodged a lawsuit with the Yasamal District Court asking the court to order the eviction of J. and his family from the flat. 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC000081908
25 avril 2017
exams for real estate agents and for persons providing public road transport services; (f) keeping a register of all printed media; and (g) offering mediation services in consumer protection lawsuits
ECLI:CEDH:001-155311
19 mai 2015
He reiterated his complaints raised in his lawsuit before the Administrative Court and submitted that this latter court had not provided any reason regarding his complaints that the publication of the
Pôle 4 - Chambre 5
5fd96a799adee256656f880e
5 février 2020
032 00025 Représentée par Me Anne GRAPPOTTE-BENETREAU de la SCP GRAPPOTTE BENETREAU, avocats associés, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : K0111 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Octave HOCHER,SCP LACOURTE
8ème Chambre
DTA_2208412_20250114
14 janvier 2025
Par deux mémoires, enregistrés le 14 novembre 2022 et le 29 juin 2023, la société par actions simplifiée (SAS) Kaufman and Broad Développement, représentée par SCP Lacourte-Raquin-Tatar, conclut au rejet
7ème chambre
DTA_2201951_20240326
26 mars 2024
Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 5 avril 2022 et 20 juillet 2022, la société " Gambetta Ile-de-France " représentée par le cabinet Lacourte Raquin Tatar, conclut, à titre principal, au rejet
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002337194
16 octobre 1996
V, in order to be informed of the date of lawsuit No. 29/87. The reply he received was that the case was under investigation in Nicosia without explanation by which body."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD001869608
9 décembre 2010
On an unspecified date in 1999, the applicant lodged a lawsuit with the Yasamal District Court asking the court to order the eviction of M. and his family from the apartment. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615DEC001393602
15 juin 2004
I have brought an action against the administration's decision and I have won the lawsuit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD002879607
2 mai 2013
Discontinuation of the proceedings on the case “The court discontinues the proceedings on the case, if: ... a plaintiff withdraws his lawsuit and the court accepts the withdrawal ...” Article 221.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1125JUD004401911
25 novembre 2014
Their lawsuits followed a similar pattern, but sometimes had varying results, and included the following proceedings. B. The proceedings 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD004098407
22 avril 2010
Chapter 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“the CCP”), consisting of Articles 296-300, provides for the procedure for examining civil lawsuits concerning decisions and acts (or omissions)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0629JUD001547202
29 juin 2007
However, as can be seen from the Supreme Court’s judgment, the applicant parents’ lawsuit and appeal to the Supreme Court had been directed against the KRL subject and its implementation generally.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0125JUD002990716
25 janvier 2022
; The applicants submitted that they had complied with the exhaustion requirement, particularly since their complaints had concerned discrimination and they had brought an anti-discrimination civil lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD001483318
18 janvier 2022
On 3 November 2016 the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court accepted the applicant’s lawsuit for examination.