CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 379 résultats pour « Ilan »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD003050011

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2017

1 juin 2017

Whatever mode is employed, the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention (see, for example, mutatis mutandis , Ilhan v.

Page 68 sur 69

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD000295407

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

which arises is whether the minimum level of severity required for a violation of Article 3 of the Convention can be regarded as having been attained in the instant case (see, among other authorities, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD001556202

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

whereas in cases of serious ill ‑ treatment by State agents an alleged breach of Article 3 cannot be remedied exclusively through the payment of compensation (see, among many other authorities, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1024JUD003673297

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2002

24 octobre 2002

According to the Court's settled case-law, such incompatibility is present ratione personae if the applicant cannot or can no longer claim to be a victim of the alleged violation (see, for example, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1005JUD003136596

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2000

5 octobre 2000

remains free to make its own assessment in the light of all the material before it, it is only in exceptional circumstances that it will exercise its powers in this area (see, as a recent authority, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0131DEC003818797

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2002

31 janvier 2002

domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate and ineffective ( see İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109JUD002573205

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2010

9 novembre 2010

This would ensure that the application was brought with the consent of the victim of the alleged breach and would avoid actio popularis applications (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003711297

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2001

21 novembre 2001

An amendment was added to Article IIIC at the ILA’s 1994 conference, providing for immunity to be granted where “the employee was appointed under the public (administrative) law of the foreign state such

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209JUD004085205

Admin. suprême

9 février 2016

9 février 2016

to ensure that the applicant’s injuries were immediately examined and documented by a doctor divested the applicant of an important safeguard against a breach of Article 3 of the Convention (compare İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0320JUD000541003

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2007

20 mars 2007

the responsibility of a Contracting State may be engaged, including under Article 3 of the Convention by reason of the failure to provide appropriate medical treatment (see, among other authorities, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD002677107

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2011

5 avril 2011

    The Court reiterates that the remedy required by Article 13 must be “effective” in practice as well as in law (see, for example, İlhan v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1004JUD005864300

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2007

4 octobre 2007

It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected to exhaust domestic remedies (see, among many authorities, İlhan  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD000520309

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2011

15 décembre 2011

A lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no.   22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD007547201

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2010

16 septembre 2010

Given these considerations and in view of the Convention case­law in this respect and in particular the criteria of severity and the purpose of the ill-treatment (see, among other authorities, İlhan v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD001611702

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

of appropriate medical care and, more generally, the detention in inappropriate conditions of a person who is ill may in principle amount to treatment contrary to Article   3 (see, for example, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD007007711

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

initiative of the next of kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigative procedures (see Kelly and Others , cited above, § 94, and, mutatis mutandis , İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD005038999

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2003

31 juillet 2003

obligations under Article 13 varies depending on the nature of the applicant's complaint; however, the remedy required by Article 13 must be “effective” in practice as well as in law (see, for example, İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD000870121

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2022

4 octobre 2022

; In order to lodge an application in accordance with Article   34 of the Convention, an individual must be able to show that he or she was “directly affected” by the measure complained of (see İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615DEC007153714

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2017

15 juin 2017

Convention generally, which as a treaty for the collective enforcement of human rights and fundamental freedoms must be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see İlhan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD004802306

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

detention of a person who is ill may raise issues under Article 3 of the Convention (ibid., § 37) and that the lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to that provision (see İlhan

Source officielle