just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April 1995;     Whereas, at the 539th meeting of the Deputies held

on 1 April 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

votes to one the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 477th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

on 1 April 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

the Convention and that it was not necessary to examine the case under Article 13 (art. 13) of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 519th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

on 11 June 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 11 June 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 19 October 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 5 December 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

5, paragraphs 1 and 4 (art. 5-1, art. 5-4), of the Convention, but not of Article 5, paragraph 2 (art. 5-2);        Whereas, at the 487th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

on 21 September 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 21 October 1994;        Whereas, at the 522nd meeting of the Deputies held

on 11 June 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 15 October 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 485th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

complaint concerning the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the labour courts; Whereas in its judgment of 18 October 2001 the Court unanimously: - held

that the applicant died in the course of the proceedings and that his widow, have expressed the wish to continue the proceedings; Whereas in its judgment of 26 September 2000 the Court unanimously: - held

opinion that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 477th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held