CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

37 047 résultats pour « Hechinger »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0415DEC002861695

Admin. suprême

15 avril 1997

15 avril 1997

        The date of a hearing was fixed for 30 December 1992.   The applicant requested that this hearing be adjourned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD001734213

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2021

18 mai 2021

Ms S. and her representative attended the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC003263696

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2001

16 janvier 2001

The court did not hold a hearing prior to this decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204DEC001716906

Admin. suprême

4 février 2010

4 février 2010

In any event a hearing had not been necessary. Relying on the case of Kaipila v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142598

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

It appears that the court did not rule on the request for the applicant’s personal participation in the hearing and did not examine the question whether he had been summoned to the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223743

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

(overcrowding) since 29/06/2015 and until the applicant’s release on 11/05/2018;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1013JUD003680106

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2011

13 octobre 2011

reasons against holding a hearing.” 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC000787714

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

    Further hearings were held on 29 April and 15 May 2014.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0511DEC007507501

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2002

11 mai 2002

The next hearing was held on 5   January 1995. The court heard the experts and adjourned the hearing sine die .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0703DEC005746800

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2001

3 juillet 2001

In 1992 the court adjourned two hearings. On 16 February 1993 the court held a hearing and ordered an expert report.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0318DEC005522000

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2003

18 mars 2003

On 26 November 1998 the District Court held a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015DEC005142999

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2002

15 octobre 2002

Subsequently, the court held hearings on 2 July and 5 September 1990. On 3 October 1990 the court held a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192096

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

The parties to the proceedings shall be informed about the time and place of the court hearing ... by a court summons ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219DEC003883209

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

    Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicants maintained that their right to a fair and public hearing was breached as they were never afforded a public hearing in the determination

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140127

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

Meanwhile, on 22 September 2009 the first oral hearing in the criminal proceedings against the applicant was held before the Linz Regional Court. The next oral hearing was held on 24 November 2009.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0722JUD003299302

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2008

22 juillet 2008

account in a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2740799-3004962

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

  The prosecutor was present at the appeal hearing which took place on 16 August 2001.   There was no written proof that Ms Batsanina received any summons for that hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC003171102

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

A hearing scheduled for 15 January 1997 was re-scheduled. On 5 February and 23 April 1997 the District Court held hearings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC004418198

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

The court held hearings on 30   January and 13 May   1995. The hearings listed for 13   July   and 30   October   1995 were adjourned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214JUD003360096

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

    Apparently no hearing was held on 27 August   1991. 20.     The next hearing took place on 1   October   1991. A witness gave evidence.

Source officielle

Page 68 sur 1853

← PrécédentSuivant →