CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
3ème Chambre
DCA_25NT00112_20250704
4 juillet 2025
Il est constant que l'OFPRA et le préfet du Finistère ont fondé leur appréciation sur les mêmes éléments portés à leur connaissance.
Page 68 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD004672699
9 avril 2002
Non-pecuniary damage 50.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0307DEC002097292
7 mars 1996
The applicant also admits that he could have sued the State for damages in pursuance of the Tort Liability Act.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0118JUD002848112
18 janvier 2018
Damage 100. The applicant claimed 8,120 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and EUR 50,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD003197303
13 novembre 2014
The District Court also ordered the applicant to pay damages to the civil parties. 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1116JUD003112796
16 novembre 1999
Damage 72. The applicant claimed compensation for the various heads of damage suffered, assessing them at between five and ten thousand million Italian lire (ITL) in total.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD001346206
10 janvier 2012
The prosecutor also ordered the district prosecutor’s office to conduct constant monitoring of the situation. 40.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC006841601
6 avril 2004
The judge awarded US McDonald's GBP 30,000 damages and UK McDonald's a further GBP 30,000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130JUD003568397
30 janvier 2001
It also ordered him to pay damages. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD006754201
15 mai 2008
The prosecutor preferred the charge of theft aggravated by repetition and substantial damage, an offence under Article 158 § 2 of the Criminal Code. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD005129511
22 juillet 2021
Damage 59. The applicant claimed 8,500 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD002554514
9 janvier 2018
Damage caused by unlawful actions of municipal authority institutions must be redressed by the municipality from its own budget, irrespective of its employee’s fault. C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD002328404
28 octobre 2010
Civil claims for damages 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125JUD000262709
25 janvier 2011
Damage 81.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD003270404
17 décembre 2009
The hematoma was allowed to grow over a period of time under constant supervision by medical specialists who awaited the most propitious moment for brain surgery.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002355694
8 juillet 1999
Damage 1. Pecuniary damage 45.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD004862416
2 décembre 2021
natural light, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, inadequate temperature 3,000 20826/17 10/03/2017 Mihai PERIFAN 1977 Cătălin Gabriel Filişan Constanta
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404DEC003771597
4 avril 2000
When the Coroner accepted that the evidence should be admitted, the RUC Chief Constable applied for judicial review of those decisions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004426119
30 novembre 2021
Damage 65.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0714DEC001059483
14 juillet 1987
Chief Constable of West Midlands and another (1981) HL 3 A ER 727.)