None of those lawyers took any procedural actions on the applicants’ behalf.

Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Volet matériel) (Belarus);Violation de l'article 13+3 - Droit à un recours effectif (Article 13 - Recours effectif) (Article

On 31 October 1995 the applicant joined the proceedings as a civil party, when her husband was heard by police officers and expressed, on behalf of his wife, a wish to join the proceedings.

The application was lodged on his behalf and on behalf of his brother Ahmet Çakıcı, who has disappeared.

xa0; The Government considered that in so far as the applicant’s heir has never informed the Court about his father’s death and has not expressed his wish to pursue the proceedings before it on his behalf

Mishkovski has the requisite standing to pursue applications nos. 70176/17, 75093/17 and 33114/18 on behalf of his late father (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin   Câmpeanu v.

  (d)   to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him...” 10.

On 13 December 2003 the applicant and the other defendants requested the Court of Appeal to assign them a legal-aid lawyer to lodge a cassation appeal on their behalf with the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy

In a memorial appended to the application forms, signed by six of the thirteen applicants, they had stated that they were representing the 2,188 BIR shareholders and applying to the Court on their behalf

In particular, before deciding on their return, did the Polish authorities consider the applicants’ claims that they would be exposed to a risk of being subjected to inhuman treatment if returned to Belarus

In response, the Court apprised the applicant of Rule 36 § 4 (a) of the Rules of Court, by virtue of which a representative acting on behalf of the applicant pursuant to the Rules of Court should be an

The first applicant complains, on his behalf, about the non-enforcement of the custody arrangements (Article 8 of the Convention), and, on behalf of the second applicant, about an infringement of her right

Nevertheless, the applicant succeeded in having the Prosecutor General exercise his discretionary power to challenge the judgment on the applicants’ behalf in the Supreme Court by way of an appeal on points

The first and second applicants complained under Articles 2, 3 and 13 of the Convention, both in their own name and on behalf of their missing relative, about the disappearance of R.

  The applicants   The case concerns an application brought by Ethel Teri Eskinazi, who has French and Turkish nationality, on her own behalf and on behalf of her daughter Caroline Ruth Chelouche

The applicant was not present at the hearing before Zagreb County Court when the request for his involuntary placement in the hospital was examined and the lawyer T.Ž. made no submission on his behalf.

The public prosecutor had initially brought the proceedings concerning the pension rights on behalf of the applicant.

In particular, he alleged that the courts had lacked impartiality and that they had disregarded the evidence on his behalf, had reached untenable conclusions as to the facts and, as a result, had given

However, no observations on his behalf have been submitted.