, avocat au barreau de REIMS DÉBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 29 Janvier 2016 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Jean-Louis BERNAUD

DEBATS : A l'audience publique du 02 Octobre 2013 Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD, Conseiller, en son rapport et Madame Fabienne PAGES, Conseiller, assistés de Madame LEICKNER, Greffier, ont entendu

He also provided evidence to that effect because his telephone had the ability to record times and dates of calls.

She continued: “The only reason why I said I’d lied and made it all up was because I had pressure put on me and I’d been advised by somebody that if I said I was lying, I wouldn’t be sent to prison because

he had bought it from Mr S. in September 2005, and that the public sale had been invalid because by time when the sale had been carried out Mr S. had already paid off the sums in relation to which the

Composition de la Cour lors du délibéré : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président - Françoise CLEMENT, conseiller - Vincent NICOLAS, conseiller Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président, et par Sylvie BOURRAT

Composition de la Cour lors du délibéré : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président - Françoise CLEMENT, conseiller - Vincent NICOLAS, conseiller Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président, et par Joëlle POITOUX

On 31 July 2002 the bailiffs made a bank transfer to the applicant, but the transfer failed because of a clerical mistake. 6.

s statement was particularly credible because he had on his own motion and following questions by the court stated that he had not felt threatened by the applicant.

The applicant company appealed against this decision because the general conditions of the bond’s issue did not require that it be handed in.

       In addition to finding that the defendant surgeon did not act unlawfully (rechtswidrig) because it could be assumed that the applicant would, in the circumstances, have

According to the inventory list drawn up on 29   July 1999 after a visual inspection of the car’s exterior (because no key was available), the car was in good condition.

    On 1 December 2004 the Council of the KBA, relying on section   23(1) of the Bar Act 2004 (see paragraph 15 below), decided to suspend the applicant’s membership because a charge had

As submitted by the applicant, the interim order in question had not been made enforceable because of the ongoing proceedings in Poland.

He only had the right to visit his daughter (Besuchsrecht) which, however, he could not exercise because he was in prison.

The operation could not be performed, because Calafat Hospital did not have blood for a blood transfusion.

As to non-enforcement, the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, because she had not sued the Ministry for negligence.

According to the Government, it was refused because it was inconsistent.

    The applicant also worked in the construction sector for a short period in 2000, after which he could not be officially hired because of his lack of identity documents. 9.