CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202839
11 mai 2020
Russia , no. 23610/03, § 75, 14 January 2010) and the alleged breach of the principle of immediacy owing to the trial court’s alleged failure to hear N.G. in person before relying on the
Page 68 sur 2256
ECLI:CEDH:001-249599
12 mars 2026
2026 SECOND SECTION Application no. 13020/23 Ersan IDRIZI against North Macedonia lodged on 21 March 2023 communicated on 12 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119DEC003165217
19 janvier 2023
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Alleged
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-465523-466473
11 décembre 2001
Relying on Article 9 read together with Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), the applicants alleged that, in the exercise of the rights derived from the freedom to manifest one’s religion
ECLI:CEDH:001-204474
28 juillet 2020
The applicant and the applicant company alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that their right of access to court was breached by the Romanian authorities because they could challenge the lawfulness
ECLI:CEDH:001-233925
3 mai 2024
lack of adequate medical treatment of the applicant during his pre-trial detention and the alleged inhuman and degrading material conditions of detention, as well as the alleged lack of effective remedies
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10629
18 juin 2015
perpetrators and the date, place and nature of the alleged ill-treatment had been provided.
ECLI:CEDH:001-112505
11 juillet 2012
On 31 March 2008 the public prosecutor decided not to prosecute, on the ground that the matters alleged did not constitute criminal offences.
ECLI:CEDH:001-151136
15 janvier 2015
The applicant also claimed that his confession had been extracted as a result of the alleged ill-treatment. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511DEC004628712
11 mai 2021
THE LAW Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 21.
ECLI:CEDH:001-199344
22 novembre 2019
alleged lack of an effective remedy in respect of the Article 6 and 8 complaints.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1910
23 octobre 2008
As regards the alleged blocking of passage, there had been no complaints by anyone, whether individual visitors, judges or court employees, about the alleged obstruction of entry to the court-house by
1 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007760977
26 juillet 1991
Alfred XO..., demeurant Camping des Collines à Bouc Bel Air (13320) ; - n° 93 528, présentée pour Mme Jeanne XK..., demeurant Le Jabin, ... ; - n° 93 529, présentée pour Mme Anne-Jeane XE..., demeurant
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C310383
19 octobre 2017
Alfred qui font état d'une occupation de Mme X... du terrain litigieux depuis 1969 ; qu'Alfred N... et Anasthasie O... ont déclaré qu'à leur connaissance Mme X... occupait le terrain depuis plus de trente
9EME SOUS-SECTION JUGEANT SEULE
CETAT:CETATEXT000008206952
5 septembre 2003
Alfred W, demeurant ... ; M. Richard X, demeurant ... ; Mme Jane Y, demeurant ... ; M. Jean Z, demeurant ... ; M. Lucien AA, demeurant ... ; M. Maurice AB, demeurant ... ; M.
CHAMBRE 1
DTA_2201290_20240415
15 avril 2024
La société civile immobilière du 5 rue Alfred de Lassence dont M. B est associé à hauteur de 50 % a fait l'objet d'un contrôle sur pièces au titre de l'année 2016.
Cour d'Appel
6253cd86bd3db21cbdd93951
30 janvier 2017
l'usufruit de deux terrains cadastrés AD 43 et AD 141 d'une contenance totale de 13a 75 ca situés Route de Grand Camp à Gourbeyre, - la pleine propriété de 2 locaux référencés AL 131 situés au 23 rue Alfred
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518JUD002727803
18 mai 2006
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION WITH REGARD TO THE LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS 9.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126955
10 septembre 2013
The applicant alleged to have been ill-treated by the police and forced into confession.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13997
7 février 2023
The issue in the case was the alleged adequacy of measures aimed at protecting in criminal proceedings the rights of a child victim of sexual abuse.