Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

    It follows that the application is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article   35 §   3   (a) and must be rejected in

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ). (See also Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v.

At the same time, the Court had also held that the question of applicability was an issue of the Court’s jurisdiction ratione materiae and the relevant analysis should be carried out at the admissibility

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

    Par conséquent, cette branche du grief est incompatible ratione materiae avec les dispositions de la Convention. 80.

Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatible ratione materiae ). (Voir aussi Demir et Baykara c.   Turquie [GC], 34503/97, 12   novembre 2008, Résumé juridique   ; Barış et autres c.

    Le Gouvernement soulève trois exceptions, dont la première porte sur l’incompatibilité ratione materiae de la requête avec la Convention.

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ). (See Weeks v.   the United Kingdom, 9787/82 , 2   March 1987; Ganusauskas v.

Conclusion : irrecevable (incompatibilité ratione materiae ). (Voir Denisov c. Ukraine [GC], 76639/11, 25 septembre 2018, Note d’information 221   ; Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko et autres c.

Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatibilité ratione materiae ).

The applicants’ complaint was therefore incompatible ratione materiae with the Convention provisions. Conclusion: Inadmissible.

    The Government invited the Court to reject the case as incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention with reference to Article   17 of the Convention.

    In the light of the above considerations, the Court considers that the above complaint must be rejected as being incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention, pursuant

Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatibilité ratione materiae ). (Voir aussi Társaság a Szabadságjogokért c.

    It follows that the complaint under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention

    Il s’ensuit que le grief tiré de cette disposition est incompatible ratione materiae avec les dispositions de la Convention, au sens de l’article   35 § 3, et qu’il doit être rejeté

    Thus, given that the compatibility ratione materiae is an issue which the Court must examine on its own motion (see, for instance, Blečić v.