The suspicion against him had been essentially based on the applicants’ statements, but in view of the ongoing conflict between them and P.K., those statements could not be considered credible. 17 .

Taking into account the inconsistency of the statements made by [witness P.] and their manifest contradiction with [the applicant’s] statements, the court considers [these] statements as to [witness P.

In disappearance cases, where there is a state of ignorance and uncertainty and, by definition, a failure to account for what has happened, if not an appearance of deliberate concealment and obstruction

is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

    Shortly before the start of the demonstration, members of a religious organisation, the Orthodox Parents’ Union, arrived at the Tbilisi Concert Hall area.

A member of the Congregation also had his head shaved while those holding him in place recited a prayer.

The State Attorney’s Office indicted him on 6 March 2015. 4 .

Referring, inter alia , to the State Construction Norms of 1 January 2000, the court held that the applicant had failed to obtain a construction project approved by a State expert examination and to carry

attached to the State Aviation University (“the SAU”), in order to qualify as a helicopter pilot. 3.

Marioli, President of the State Legal Council and their Agent’s delegate, Ms Z.

or that the said act was attributable to that State.

xa0; František Horváth had died before the judgment had been adopted and that Ms Renata Fekete (born 1965), Mr Jozef Tóth (born 1969) and Mr Oto Tóth (born 1966) are heirs after Mrs Margita Tóthová, while

What was being contested was the payment of interest.

  Tsaousi, Legal Counsellor at the State Legal Council and Ms   A.   Dimitrakopoulou, Senior Adviser at the State Legal Council. 4.

  The Secretary of State on 13 December 1988 issued a further public interest immunity certificate.

The Netherlands State lodged a cross ‑ appeal ( incidenteel beroep ). 18.

The Secretary of State issued the certificate on 28   October 1987.

No witness statements or any other evidence was collected from the scene at the time. 5 .

She made a statement to the police.