CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD003852802
27 avril 2006
On 30 December 2003 the applicant lodged a motion with the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office ( Vrhovno državno tožilstvo , “the Office”) requesting it to lodge a request for the protection
Page 67 sur 351
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179376
13 novembre 2017
whether Article 603 § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be interpreted as requiring that detention pending an extradition which was in its administrative phase could only be extended upon a motion
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510DEC005051699
10 mai 2001
It was adjourned on 7 to 8 May, 11 June, 12 August and 29 to 30 September 1997 of the court’s own motion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0722JUD002684605
22 juillet 2008
The Court raised of its own motion a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention. This provision, in its relevant part, reads: “1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121JUD007203614
21 janvier 2025
He argued that the domestic administrative courts ought to have verified, of their own motion, whether the criminal acquittal judgment had become irrevocable. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC004594399
13 septembre 2001
R. filed a motion to object that decision, but her motion was denied on 28 December 1999.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD003711317
20 juin 2023
Before the Bucharest Court of Appeal, the case was referred to a bench composed of two judges, C. and U, whom the applicant raised objections against and lodged a motion for their recusal
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304DEC002901718
4 mars 2025
Those not deciding finally may, either on the court’s own motion or upon request, made only during the hearing of the case and not independently, be repealed at any stage of the proceedings until a final
Tribunal Administratif de Besançon
DTA_2502345_20251124
24 novembre 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 6 novembre 2025, la commune des Fourgs, représentée par Me Mollion, demande au juge des référés sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1220JUD001735003
20 décembre 2007
view and due to the fact that the parties initiated altogether four actions against each other which were examined jointly and that they submitted extensive written material and made many procedural motions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD002078504
13 janvier 2011
At the next hearing of 21 April 2004 the court granted the applicant’s motion for an outpatient DNA testing and stayed the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0128DEC004429121
28 janvier 2025
In this regard, the Court has noted that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule 44C § 1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0703DEC004597299
3 juillet 2003
On 20 March 1997 the Toruń District Court dismissed the motions of the applicant and of his former wife, and upheld the decision of 8 February 1994 as to the access arrangements.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-219376
31 août 2022
Vasil Stefanov VASILEV 1951 bulgare Momin Sbor 6. Anka Petrova VASILEVA 1954 bulgare Veliko Tarnovo
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1102JUD003338496
2 novembre 2004
Le 6 novembre 1995, Momine Seyhan, la mère du requérant, adressa une demande au procureur de la République de Dargeçit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD003839903
4 mars 2008
He also filed a new motion for an exemption from court fees. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003387096
6 juillet 1999
On 16 September 1997 the Łódź Governor decided, of his own motion, to resume two sets of appeal proceedings, which had been stayed on 26 July 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC000483512
30 août 2016
On 1 October 2009 he submitted a motion for rectification of the judgment on 6 October 2009 a motion for bias of the judge indicating, inter alia , that judge D. had been found biased by a decision of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002722505
21 décembre 2010
However, in the present case the same issue, i.e. the amount of the applicant's remuneration, was addressed by the judge in her motion and later by the court in its decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0509DEC001445002
9 mai 2006
Accordingly, his motions had been considered as an abuse of the “law of the poor” ( prawo ubogich ).