CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 012 résultats pour « Mompion »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD003852802

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2006

27 avril 2006

    On 30 December 2003 the applicant lodged a motion with the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office ( Vrhovno državno tožilstvo , “the Office”) requesting it to lodge a request for the protection

Page 67 sur 351

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179376

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2017

13 novembre 2017

whether Article 603 § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be interpreted as requiring that detention pending an extradition which was in its administrative phase could only be extended upon a motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510DEC005051699

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2001

10 mai 2001

It was adjourned on 7 to 8 May, 11 June, 12 August and   29 to 30 September 1997 of the court’s own motion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0722JUD002684605

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2008

22 juillet 2008

    The Court raised of its own motion a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention. This provision, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121JUD007203614

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

He argued that the domestic administrative courts ought to have verified, of their own motion, whether the criminal acquittal judgment had become irrevocable. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC004594399

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2001

13 septembre 2001

R. filed a motion to object that decision, but her motion was denied on 28   December   1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD003711317

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2023

20 juin 2023

    Before the Bucharest Court of Appeal, the case was referred to a bench composed of two judges, C. and U, whom the applicant raised objections against and lodged a motion for their recusal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304DEC002901718

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2025

4 mars 2025

Those not deciding finally may, either on the court’s own motion or upon request, made only during the hearing of the case and not independently, be repealed at any stage of the proceedings until a final

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Besançon

DTA_2502345_20251124

Administratif

24 novembre 2025

24 novembre 2025

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 6 novembre 2025, la commune des Fourgs, représentée par Me Mollion, demande au juge des référés sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1220JUD001735003

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2007

20 décembre 2007

view and due to the fact that the parties initiated altogether four actions against each other which were examined jointly and that they submitted extensive written material and made many procedural motions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD002078504

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

At the next hearing of 21 April 2004 the court granted the applicant’s motion for an outpatient DNA testing and stayed the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0128DEC004429121

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2025

28 janvier 2025

In this regard, the Court has noted that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule 44C § 1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0703DEC004597299

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2003

3 juillet 2003

On 20 March 1997 the Toruń District Court dismissed the motions of the applicant and of his former wife, and upheld the decision of 8   February   1994 as to the access arrangements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-219376

Admin. suprême

31 août 2022

31 août 2022

Vasil Stefanov VASILEV 1951 bulgare Momin Sbor 6. Anka Petrova VASILEVA 1954 bulgare Veliko Tarnovo  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1102JUD003338496

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2004

2 novembre 2004

    Le 6 novembre 1995, Momine Seyhan, la mère du requérant, adressa une demande au procureur de la République de Dargeçit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD003839903

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2008

4 mars 2008

He also filed a new motion for an exemption from court fees. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003387096

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

    On 16 September 1997 the Łódź Governor decided, of his own motion, to resume two sets of appeal proceedings, which had been stayed on 26 July 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC000483512

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

On 1 October 2009 he submitted a motion for rectification of the judgment on 6 October 2009 a motion for bias of the judge indicating, inter alia , that judge D. had been found biased by a decision of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002722505

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2010

21 décembre 2010

However, in the present case the same issue, i.e. the amount of the applicant's remuneration, was addressed by the judge in her motion and later by the court in its decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0509DEC001445002

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2006

9 mai 2006

Accordingly, his motions had been considered as an abuse of the “law of the poor” ( prawo ubogich ).

Source officielle