In the same hearing, the claimant asked the court to rule in accordance with the expert report. The court decided to hold another hearing and set the date to 21 June 2006.

hearing before the Kyiv Court of Appeal of 9 July 2013?

On 7 August 2006 the applicant was informed by a letter that the hearing in its case would take place on 23 August 2006.

The court held that the applicant had been timely informed of the date, time and place of the hearing.

He had not been present at the appeal hearing and alleged that he had not been notified thereof.

    The hearings scheduled for 21 September 2001 and 4 April 2002 were adjourned because B.J. had not collected a notice of the hearing date.

The applicant was not represented at that hearing. The prosecutor was present at the hearing and supported upholding the applicant’s conviction.

  The hearing was arranged for 18 July.

In 2006 she again asked for a date to be set for a hearing. The hearing was held in 2007 and the court gave a decision in the applicant’s favour.

A court may order a hearing to be held in camera (i) if a public hearing could lead to the disclosure of State secrets or other information protected by federal law; (ii)   in cases concerning defendants

The court appointed counsel N. to represent the applicant at the hearing.

The next hearing, scheduled for 29 May, was adjourned because the judge was on a training course. 13.     Several hearings were scheduled in 2003.

Turkey 03/04/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention 33 16927/20 Akbay v.

Consequences of a party’s or representative’s failure to attend a court hearing “If a party to the case fails to appear and there is no evidence that the party was duly summonsed, the hearing is to be

    The next hearing was held on 16 September 1999. 17.

    At a hearing of 21   November 2005 the District Court, in the presence of the applicant's lawyer, partly allowed the applicant's claims.

  Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - on 24/05/2021 the applicant was placed in a metal cage while he participated in a court hearing by means of a video

the default judgment of 11 October 2001 and scheduled another hearing on the merits. 10.

On 11   January 2001 witnesses K., R. and V. failed to appear at the hearing in the City Court and the hearing was adjourned to 5 February 2001.