CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209278
18 mars 2021
ADDITIONAL QUESTION TO THE PARTIES AS REGARDS APPLICATION NO. 18336/19 Was the applicant deprived of his liberty on 19 February 2019 in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, regard being had to the
Page 67 sur 2955
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD000299903
7 juin 2007
It follows that at least from 22 February 2002 to 16 July 2003 the judgment of 22 February 2002 was enforceable and it was incumbent on the State to abide by its terms (cf. Velskaya v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD004311604
7 décembre 2006
The applicant complained about the State authorities' failure to enforce the judgments of 26 February 2003 and 11 February 2004 in due time.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0209DEC000453302
9 février 2006
On 2 February 2001 these orders became enforceable. On 13 February 2001 the Regional Court opened bankruptcy proceedings concerning the F company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0210JUD001149185
10 février 1993
The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") on 16 February 1990.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:SO10199
14 février 2018
, dont le siège est [...] , dénommée Tissages et Enduction Serge Ferrari, défenderesse à la cassation ; Vu la communication faite au procureur général ; LA
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2021:128
24 février 2021
Sentenza della Corte (Quinta Sezione) del 24 febbraio 2021.#Agenzia delle Dogane contro Silcompa SpA.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:90
13 février 2025
Sentenza della Corte (Decima Sezione) del 13 febbraio 2025.#« Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss » SIA contro Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs e « Autotransporta direkcija » VSIA.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC000210109
27 mai 2014
On 21 April 2008 the applicants, complaining about the prosecution authority’s reply of 15 February 2008, reiterated their claim for victim status.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0402DEC000402305
2 avril 2009
Chechnya until he returned to Grozny on 13 February 2005.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD007011613
16 janvier 2020
In these circumstances, the Court accepts the Government’s request for revision of the judgment of 8 February 2018. 11.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126414
29 août 2013
On 18 February 2012 the applicant appealed against the detention order of 14 February 2012. On 21 February 2012 the applicant’s appeal was received by the Regional Court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161923
16 mars 2016
{ font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } Communicated on 16 March 2016 FIFTH SECTION Application no 8844/12 Christof STOLLENWERK against Germany lodged on 9 February
ECLI:CEDH:001-191384
7 février 2019
2019 FIRST SECTION Application no. 45066/17 Stjepan MESIĆ against Croatia lodged on 20 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an article published on 17 February 2015 by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC003965798
5 septembre 2000
Ferrari Bravo, President , Mrs W. Thomassen, Mr Gaukur Jörundsson, Mr R. Türmen, Mr C. Bîrsan, Mr J.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD002481603
21 juillet 2022
Ferrara , a lawyer practising in Benevento. 3. The Italian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the application. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD003699708
17 décembre 2013
4 April 2006 and 21 February 2007 (see paragraph 11 above). 20.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2008:C300162
19 février 2008
aux dépens ; Vu l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, condamne la société Cabinet médical Ferrari à payer à Mme Anne-France X... et M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC001030903
8 janvier 2008
On 18 February 2001, while he was still being detained in police custody, the applicant was questioned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC000395204
15 novembre 2005
On 4 February 2003 the court ordered the department to pay the applicant UAH 921.84 [1] in compensation.