CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219DEC004319212

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

Invoquant l’article 3 de la Convention, le requérant alléguait qu’un renvoi vers le Belarus l’exposerait à être soumis à des traitements contraires à cette disposition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219093

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2022

13 juillet 2022

In 2005 and 2006, the applicant obtained two bank loans on behalf of his company by using one of his immovable properties as collateral and providing several guarantees, including two promissory notes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-121911

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2013

29 mai 2013

On 15 April 2008 the Diyarbakır Assize Court found the applicants guilty of the offence of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation, the PKK (Kurdish Workers’ Party), under Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187566

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2018

9 octobre 2018

In particular, was he able to examine the witnesses against him and get attendance of the witness on his behalf, as required by Article   6 § 3 (d)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-379

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

In February 2010 the public prosecutor brought criminal proceedings against him in a special assize court for an offence committed on behalf of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation, for disseminating

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113340

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2012

4 septembre 2012

particular: -     did the refusal of the trial court to grant the applicant’s motions to call additional witnesses violate his right to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205989

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2020

16 octobre 2020

    Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55560

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1993

18 mai 1993

Frans Vidal, a Belgian national, who complained that he did not obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf before the Brussels Court of Appeal;        Recalling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1429

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

On 30 April 2008 the Government, as specified in the friendly settlement, paid EUR   6,000 to a bank account opened on behalf of the applicants, and the competent social-care centre appointed an interim

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226282

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2023

10 juillet 2023

Prior to the searches, written search warrants were not served on the applicant or a person who had authority to act on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0522DEC000262123

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2025

22 mai 2025

On 24 January 2024 the applicant’s representative reiterated this request on behalf of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175356

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

    Was the applicant able to examine the witnesses against him and have examined those on his behalf as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140715

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

On 27 May 2008 the Diyarbakır Assize Court found the applicant guilty of the offence of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation, the PKK, under Article 7 § 2 of the Prevention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617DEC003082916

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2021

17 juin 2021

On 10 December 2020 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s address asking whether there was a person who wished to pursue the proceedings on the behalf of the late applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC007435701

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2006

5 janvier 2006

The third applicant moved to Belarus. He alleges that on an unspecified date in 1994 he was kidnapped in Belarus by the Lithuanian authorities, and unlawfully moved to Lithuania.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126DEC000846423

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

finds that the complaints regarding discrimination on grounds of age in the refusal of the fishing licence under Article 14 and under Article   8, in so far as that complaint has been brought on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417DEC001084208

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

In that regard, the court relied on the statements of the applicant’s mother and also on the statements of two witnesses on her behalf, one of whom was the applicant’s cousin.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002305503

Admin. suprême

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

The Court observes that, at the time of lodging the present application, the applicant was the executive director of the Company, competent to act on its behalf in court proceedings.

Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

6790899ca212a19f662df674

Appel

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

[Y] [F] [Adresse 7] [Adresse 7] [Localité 5] Représenté par Maître Marie-Brigitte BERRAGUAS-TESSIER de la SCP BERRAGUAS-TESSIER DOS SANTOS-MAISONNEUVE, avocat au barreau de CLERMONT-FERRAND Timbre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12877

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2020

25 juin 2020

back to 2013, the applicants being three Comorian nationals: a father (the first applicant) and his two children (then aged 3 and 5 – unless otherwise specified below, the complaints were submitted on behalf

Source officielle

Page 67 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →