a      breach by the State concerned of its obligations under the      Convention.

It follows that the period to be taken into consideration by the Court starts on 1 May 1993.

; The court held that this term had to be understood, in the light of linguistic interpretation, as a situation when a trainee had completed all obligations connected with the training programme and what

Later that evening she talked to her mother and to a friend, A.B., explaining them what had happened.

    The applicants complain under Article 2 and, in substance, Article   8 of the Convention that the Turkish State is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Atatürk University (State

In March 1993, by prior arrangement, the applicant supplied a Star 6.35   mm semiautomatic pistol to one Y., a prison guard employed in the detention centre “De Schie” in Rotterdam.

The statement referred to their having painted a slogan on a wall, distributed a publication entitled Kurtuluş , put up a poster in the entrance to a shop and watched while another member of the DHKP-C

The report must state if any matter has been excluded.   (e)   The Commissioner’s Reports (1986-1993).

’s statement, and other statements made in other criminal proceedings concerning the same crimes, including statements the applicant chose to make (after consulting a lawyer) in those proceedings, as well

    In principle it is not for the Court to determine what may be the appropriate measures of redress for a respondent State to perform in accordance with its obligations under Article 46 of

Ms   Svalova was fined for holding a sign featuring a white dove alongside the words “I stand for peace” (no.

The applicant confirmed his earlier statements. C.     Trial 20.     On 25   May 2006 the District Court fixed a trial start date of 7   June 2006. 21 .

Soler, State Advocate, and Dr J. Vella, Advocate at the Office of the State Advocate. 4.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

In reality the use made of it was a concession granted by the State to a third party for private commercial purposes.

  Originally, the property consisted of three different parts called Flundrarp 4:9, Stubbarp 8:17 and Stubbarp 8:18.   The total surface is around eight hectares.

As I say, it is up to you what inferences you draw, if any.”

His witness statements made at trial had been coherent and consistent with submissions previously made before the investigative authorities at the pre-trial stage.

The investigator held that G.G.’s allegations against the applicant lacked credibility, whereas his allegations against G.G. had been supported by, inter alia , witness statements (in particular, statements

    On 11 January 1994, while still in Villefranche-sur-Saône Prison, the applicant applied to the Lyons Court of Appeal for rescission of the exclusion order.