Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 10   November 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,   Mark

LG COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 16 mars 2022 Cassation partielle M.

Poland, judgment of 25 March 1998, Reports 1998 ‑ II, §§   38 to 40; Constantinescu , cited above; Sigurþór Arnarsson v. Iceland , no.

    On 31 March 2010 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

  33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v.

[Y] [X] étant décédé le 11 mars 2015, il a été radié du tableau de l'Ordre des Experts-comptables et de la [9] à effet du 31 mars 2015 ; qu'il avait, jusqu'à la date de son décès, l'obligation d'être affilié

2014 avec capitalisation à la date anniversaire, soit le 31 mars 2015, Indemnité en application des dispositions de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile : 6.000 €.

Kft's own purposes, thus causing damage of some 1,400,000 Hungarian forints (HUF). The bill of indictment was served upon the applicant on 20 April 1993.

MATHEZ Transports Internationaux indique, dans un courrier du 10 mars 2004, adressé à sa cliente, la S.A.

MATHEZ Transports Internationaux indique, dans un courrier du 10 mars 2004, adressé à sa cliente, la S. A.

  33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v.

    On 30 March 2007 the Chief Prosecutor’s Office rejected the complaint.

with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Hungarian national, Mr István Gábor Kovács (“the applicant”), on 5 March

Navalnyy   Perm 23/01/2021   Rally (march) in support of Mr A.

Il soutient que sa situation, au répertoire des entreprises, datée du 1er mars 2021 montre la réalité de son activité d'éleveur / agriculteur.

    On 16 March 2011 the County Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the applicant’s complaint for want of evidence, pointing out that there had been no impartial witness to the incident.

On 10 June 2004 it fined the applicant 300,000   Hungarian forints (HUF) (approximately 1,000 euros (EUR)) for having committed a serious disciplinary offence.

Le 13 mars 1986, M.

Criminal proceedings were instituted on 2 September 2014 / On 30 March 2015 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.