Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118366
12 mars 2013
12 mars 2013
On 10 May 2006 the Tverskoy District Court found the applicant and Mr L. guilty of disorderly acts and intentional destruction and degradation of others’ property in public places.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139541
20 novembre 2013
20 novembre 2013
He did not admit his guilt for charges brought under Articles 225 § 3 and 300 § 1 of the CC and refused to testify.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161577
24 février 2016
24 février 2016
On 17 March 2008 the Klaipėda District Court found the applicant guilty of both charges. The court established that the applicant had caused the accident under the influence of alcohol.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC000041016
4 novembre 2025
4 novembre 2025
On 3 July 2013 the Katerini Three-Member Misdemeanour Court, by judgment no. 1135/2013, found both defendants guilty of manslaughter by negligence and sentenced each of them to three years
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC004154122
2 décembre 2025
2 décembre 2025
In its judgment of 12 January 2018, the Maribor District Court found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to ten years and nine months’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0425DEC004501998
25 avril 2002
25 avril 2002
In a judgment of 9 February 1994 the Toulouse Criminal Court found the applicant guilty of the offences charged and sentenced him to a day-fine, calculated on the basis of 200 French francs (FRF) per day
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC000638315
5 septembre 2023
5 septembre 2023
On 5 April 2013, the Lankaran Court of Serious Crimes found the applicant guilty as charged on all counts and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0909DEC001902891
9 septembre 1992
9 septembre 1992
By judgment of 13 December 1990 the applicant was found guilty of assault and of having threatened another person, contrary to Sections 244 and 266 of the Penal Code, whereas the Court did not find that
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC002844705
4 juin 2013
4 juin 2013
In a letter of 17 December 2004 the applicant challenged the judge, claiming that she had agreed to ask for an expert report, but later expressed her view that he was guilty of the offence
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2673123-2932422
24 mars 2009
24 mars 2009
application no 37201/06), it had concluded that many international sources referred to numerous and regular instances of torture and ill-treatment inflicted in Tunisia on persons suspected or found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD003815116
9 décembre 2025
9 décembre 2025
On 19 August 2013, following the main trial and the evidential hearing, the Subotica Court of First Instance found the applicant guilty of robbery and sentenced him to two years and six months
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186741
13 septembre 2018
13 septembre 2018
delivered by the Mureș County Court and the final judgment of 10 January 2014 delivered by the Târgu-Mureș Court of Appeal, the domestic authorities reached different conclusions concerning his criminal guilt
Source officielleciv1
60794b609ba5988459c42d70
8 février 1984
8 février 1984
CIVIL DANS SA REDACTION ANTERIEURE A LA LOI DU 12 JUILLET 1980, ATTENDU QUE LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE A MIS A NEANT L'ORDONNANCE D'INJONCTION DE PAYER LA SOMME DE 132 FRANCS PRONONCEE A LA DEMANDE DE LA GUILDE
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC001204205
19 novembre 2013
19 novembre 2013
He relied on Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002812095
27 novembre 1996
27 novembre 1996
If I accept and can rely on the contents of the accused's admissions these are sufficient to establish their guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC001729390
30 juin 1993
30 juin 1993
Furthermore, after an evaluation of the evidence before it, the High Court also found the applicant guilty of the charges to the extent found by the City Court. The sentence was upheld.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC002902195
25 mai 1999
25 mai 1999
Such a person shall be considered innocent until his or her guilt has been established by a final decision. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4842
27 mai 2003
27 mai 2003
At the same time, the Paris Criminal Court, by a judgment of July 1996, which became final, had found Dr Gruber guilty of the minor offence of breach of professional secrecy and found the journalist who
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4641
25 novembre 2003
25 novembre 2003
completed constitutional proceedings (Article 292 of the Law on the Organisation of the Courts): preliminary objection dismissed Facts : In June 1993 the Audiencia Nacional found the applicant guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-80
16 février 2012
16 février 2012
The officer was found guilty as charged but released from criminal liability and punishment as the charges were time-barred.
Source officiellePage 66 sur 692