Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Biondi delivered on 26 February

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Nibbio delivered on 26 February

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Barbagallo case delivered on 27 February

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fredin 2 case delivered on 23 February

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)3 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 February

The applicant alleged that the bailiff had not notified her of the rulings of 25 February 2016 and 19 January 2018.

On 14 February 2012 the police performed the searches. On 30 March 2012 the Khakassiya Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s complaints about two search orders of 10 February 2012.

On 19 January 2007 the Leninskiy District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 21 February 2007.

THE LAW The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the judgment of 9 February 2005. She invoked Articles 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the Convention.

In two decisions dated 14 February 2020 the State Gambling Commission (hereinafter “the Commission”) ordered the first applicant to pay in total about 19 million Bulgarian levs (BGN) – the equivalent of

France commerciale de ses demandes en concurrence déloyale et parasitaire, au lieu de le casser en tant qu'il déboute les sociétés Ferrero et Ferrero France commerciale de leurs demandes en concurrence

On 22 February 2001 the prosecutor ordered the applicant’s detention on remand as a preventive measure.

It also ordered the respondent to pay the applicant a monthly allowance in the amount of RUB 5,445.99 starting from 1 February 2001.

On 7 February 2004 Ms M. made a statement to the Kyivskyy District Police Department in Kharkiv.

and 26 February 1986 containing Ms.

fin au contrat de marque la liant à la société Marckley CBH, la société Parfums Rochas (société Rochas) a obtenu la saisie-contrefaçon de montres fabriquées sous sa marque et retenues par la société Ferrari

On 22 February 2012 the summonses about the hearing of 21 February 2012 were delivered to the applicant and his representative.

On 2   February 2007 the applicant was remanded in custody following a habeas corpus hearing.

On 19 April 2007 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation upheld the detention order of 19 February 2007. B.