On 13 February 1996 the court ordered the applicant’s psychiatric examination, considering that his experiences in Belarus could have affected his mental health.

public prosecutor by telephone to prolong the applicant's detention in police custody by two days under Article 58 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to date and sign the prolongation order on his behalf

    It appears that the applicant also wishes to raise her complaint before the Commission on behalf of her child born out of wedlock in November 1986.

to hear the two attesting witnesses: Beyond their specific characterisation in domestic law, in the circumstances of the case the two witnesses in question had to be considered as “witnesses on her behalf

Ukraine (n° 2929/05) Le requérant, Grigoriy Svetloroussov, est un ressortissant du Bélarus né en 1966 et résidant à Kiev (Ukraine).

    In Murtazaliyeva the Court adopted a three-pronged test as regards the examination of complaints concerning the domestic courts’ refusal to examine a witness on the applicant’s behalf: (1

Spain ((dec.), no. 48335/99, ECHR 2000-XI) that the applicant was not entitled to rely, on behalf of the deceased person, on rights under Articles 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 14 of the Convention, as those rights

  (d)     to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ..

    The first applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention on behalf of himself and the second applicant about the alleged violation of their right to respect for their family life.

The BCEA offered to make the payment not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of a contract of sale to be entered into by the applicant and an individual acting on behalf of the BCEA.

né le 30 juillet 1927 à NICE (06) demeurant C / O SCP BENABU-... Monsieur Jean- Michel Roland Y... né le 4 mars 1960 à NICE (06) demeurant C / O SCP BENABU-... Monsieur Denis Emile Y...

    On 19 August 2014 Mr Erol Hasa expressed his wish to pursue the proceedings on behalf of his father, who died on 23 May 2014.

Therefore, the court finds that the accused committed the offences of committing an offence on behalf of a terrorist organisation without being a member of it, intentionally endangering public security

   The applicant lodges various complaints about custody and access matters in his own name and also on behalf of his daughter.

    The applicant alleged that he had not had a fair trial, in that the domestic court had refused his request to have witnesses on his behalf examined.

The applicant duly paid the invoices on behalf of K and M.

On 1 February 2018 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s address asking whether there was a person who wished to pursue the proceedings on the deceased applicant’s behalf.

A cassation appeal submitted by the Ombudsman on the applicant’s behalf was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 29   March   2017 (served on the applicant on 14 April 2017).

Under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, it was claimed on behalf of the applicant that the child maintenance proceedings before the Municipal Court in Smederevo have been excessively