Had his State pension benefited from up-rating since 1987 it would now be worth GBP   82.05 a week. 3.     Venice Stewart 12.     Mrs Stewart was born in 1931.

    On 7 August 2007 the investigator decided to start an investigation on account of forgery. 14.

Finally, the Government did not specify what effective remedies the applicant should have availed herself of to expedite the proceedings. 53.

    On 22 November 2007 the police took the applicant’s wife’s statement.

Following two reminders in April and July 1998 the court received the applicant’s statement of grounds of appeal on 10   November 1998. 14.

Special features of the adjudication of cases stemming from proceedings instituted by State authorities [and] concerning restrictions on the right to freedom of peaceful assembly “1.

  The Government maintained that the proceedings at issue had been particularly extensive and had concerned complex events in the context of white-collar crime.

No representations were made by the applicant to the Secretary of State. The application was granted by the Secretary of State.

          On 1 February 1989 the Stuttgart Administrative Court rejected the applicant's action seeking the repeal of the expulsion order.

While the third applicant was being pushed away by the guard, three of the other band members continued singing and dancing without music.

While it was true that the new salaries were lower, this reduction had been justified.

    Applicants’ statements during the criminal investigations 14.     On 18 November 2003 the first applicant made a statement to the police, in the presence of a lawyer.

Some say that they did not know what ahimsa is. They were not aware but there are rumours [that] things said about ahimsa in the Quran.

The applicant’s health problems while in detention 22.

In or about November 1998, the Secretary of State set the applicant’s tariff at five years.

    On the merits, the Court starts by noting that the circumstances of the case are similar to those examined by it in Kirilova and Others , cited above (see also Lazarov v.

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

  The European Court, while examining the circumstances of the cases, had regard to the specific features of the Polish legal aid system and observed that the refusal of legal aid by a lawyer should

Soler, State Advocate, and Dr J.