CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003169896
14 janvier 1998
He lived 10 kilometres away from the forest, suffered from pain in the back and had to lie down after working in the forest.
Page 65 sur 101
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-157720
9 septembre 2015
aujourd’hui un problème majeur en Europe, qui menace les droits de l’homme et les valeurs fondamentales des sociétés démocratiques : « La traite des êtres humains, parce qu’elle prend au piège
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0619DEC004782999
19 juin 2003
As to the legal issues raised by the case, it was true that they involved an international treaty and a piece of legislation from the 1940s, but it had to borne in mind that, since the applicant’s case
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0514DEC007057317
14 mai 2019
In their letter confirming the outcome of the disciplinary hearing, the panel referred to various pieces of evidence, including inter alia the iPhone material and selected personal e-mails and Whatsapp
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD001370818
11 février 2025
applicants in view of the reclassification of the offence by a court at the last stage of the appeal proceedings, and the non ‑ disclosure of certain documents and information on which an important piece
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0106DEC004527599
6 janvier 2004
The applicant owns a piece of real property, known as “Tegnér 7”, in central Lund.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302DEC004259021
2 mars 2023
The Social Services corroborated the data with several pieces of evidence: (i) medical reports which stated that on 26 and 27 July 2019 the applicant had reported having suspicions that she was being administered
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD002638402
9 juin 2005
Accordingly, the Court made no award under this head. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD003504516
16 décembre 2021
; Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others and Polgar, both cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD002179112
5 avril 2018
It appears that during the proceedings the District Court examined forty-seven witnesses, about thirty pieces of documentary evidence and five expert opinions, one of which was ordered by the District
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0925JUD006732601
25 septembre 2008
The applicant stated that such shells could only be fired from heavy artillery pieces, which presumably were in the exclusive possession of the Russian armed forces.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC003982008
30 mars 2010
He showed the applicant a piece of text printed on a sheet of paper: “Did [N.] bring [it]?” (“ Kas [N.] tõi ära? ”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD005135510
10 octobre 2013
He confirmed that he had seen the applicant throwing a piece of newspaper into the rubbish bin, which one of his colleagues had then found in the bin. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD005783709
27 novembre 2018
Moreover, the trial court had taken into account not only his statements to the police, but a number of pieces of strong evidence proving that he was guilty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD003971719
25 novembre 2021
It awards him EUR 25,000 in respect of that damage. Costs and expenses 48. The applicant also claimed EUR 30,000 for the costs and expenses incurred before the Court. 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD000105615
25 octobre 2016
The Court finds it appropriate to award the applicants EUR 5,000 each, as requested. B. Costs and expenses 52.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0221JUD001812304
21 février 2008
The case will be examined by a new formation which calls for re-examination of all pieces of evidence...
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0630REP002247993
30 juin 1998
Arif) < translation > a) "...Raids take me away to my carotid artery of guerrilla people insistence is a dreadful and a noble passion but this is not all
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212JUD000145209
12 février 2019
submitted that there had been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) because, despite repeated requests, he had not been allowed to examine the video recording of the test purchase, one of the main pieces
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0425JUD002710003
25 avril 2013
The courts had also relied on statements by other witnesses and other pieces of evidence.