barreau de LYON, COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Madame Valéry CHARBONNIER, Conseillère faisant fonction de Présidente, Madame Gaëlle BARDOSSE, Conseillère, Madame Magali DURAND-MULIN

HAUTES-ALPES, COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Madame Valéry CHARBONNIER, Conseillère faisant fonction de Présidente, Madame Gaëlle BARDOSSE, Conseillère, Madame Magali DURAND-MULIN

de VALENCE, COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Madame Valéry CHARBONNIER, Conseillère faisant fonction de Présidente, Madame Gaëlle BARDOSSE, Conseillère, Madame Magali DURAND-MULIN

07/1961 Aleksandr Vasilyevich NAGIBIN 02/03/1990 2,000             10061/09 27/01/2009 Yuliya Valentinovna SHARKOVA 29/07/1969 Valeriy Dmitriyevich MUKHIN

  42182/11, § 56, 2 June 2020, regarding defamation proceedings against the applicant; and Mukhin v. Russia , no. 3642/10, 14 December 2021, concerning closure of the applicant’s newspaper. 12.

] critique l'arrêt attaqué en ce qu'il a prononcé la confiscation en valeur du solde du compte bancaire détenu par la société [14] auprès de la banque [22] ainsi que de deux véhicules, une Bentley Mulsanne

On 17 May 2000 the political party “Liga za Demokratija” and the associations of citizens “The World Macedonian Congress” and “the Association of the Macedonians with Muslim Religion in Macedonia” asked

  38433/09, § 221, ECHR 2012, and Supreme Holy   Council of the Muslim Community v.   Bulgaria , no.

xa0;       On 1 April 1988 the applicant was allegedly arrested and detained for two days by his employer on suspicion of having participated in a demonstration arranged by Muslims

under Article 8 – about the alleged secret surveillance of him and his family by the security services for many years; under Article 9 – about the fact that the investigator in charge of his case was a Muslim

If returned, she would, furthermore, risk persecution due to the fact that she was a Sunni-Muslim.

This is an extremist Muslim group and there are a lot of documents in this respect in your main office”.

Musulin, a lawyer practicing in Zagreb. 2.     The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. The circumstances of the cases 3.

They are practising Muslims. They complain about their final exclusion from the school they had been attending as a result of wearing a headscarf during physical education and sports classes.

The court also relied on the extract from the minutes of the Branch’s General Meeting of 12 October 1997, in which the Sember peoples were allegedly called to join the Tartar Muslims in their national

The first applicant also alleged that on one occasion in Republika Srpska he had been assaulted and the windshield of his car had been smashed because he was a Muslim.

Türkiye 27/05/2022 Muhsin BAYRAK 1976 Samsun Turkish 101. 27429/22 Aydın v. Türkiye 30/05/2022 Hüseyin AYDIN 1981 Kocaeli Turkish 102. 27491/22 Oturak v.

Türkiye 11/01/2021 Muhsin İNĞEÇ 1973 İzmir Turkish 266. 6551/21 Güçlü v. Türkiye 15/01/2021 Muhsin GÜÇLÜ 1986 Balıkesir Turkish 267. 6601/21 Kılınç v.

Accordingly, we find that it cannot lead to a revocation of the expulsion order that [the applicant] and his spouse living in Denmark, whom he married in a Muslim ceremony, have three minor children from