CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD001093206
3 octobre 2017
The Court will examine the above complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled
Page 65 sur 763
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807
10 avril 2018
No one may be deprived of their liberty without legal grounds.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD006532409
12 décembre 2017
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD005014707
21 novembre 2017
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD004517508
20 octobre 2015
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD001460716
22 juillet 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0427JUD007578717
27 avril 2021
The applicants’ deprivation of liberty ended on 16 October 2017. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527JUD006460312
27 mai 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD002336115
10 juin 2021
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 5 §§ 1 and 4 and 13 of the Convention that he was deprived of his liberty unlawfully, notably on account of the fact
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0119JUD002852708
19 janvier 2012
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003541307
12 janvier 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD000923714
8 novembre 2016
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save ... in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law ...” A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD002944016
7 juillet 2022
The Government argued that the applicant should have brought an official liability action, suing the authorities for erroneous deprivation of liberty, failing which he had not exhausted domestic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0901JUD007260813
1 septembre 2022
complained under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that her arrest and detention in police custody, which had lasted for about six hours, had been unlawful, unjustified and in breach of her right to liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD003776018
6 septembre 2022
The case is about the applicant’s deprivation of liberty for over three months allegedly in the absence of a reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offence imputed to him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD002006117
In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia , the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD004496015
20 juin 2024
Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 84, ECHR 2016 (extracts), with further references). 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625JUD005648316
25 juin 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD006281816
27 juin 2024
emphasises that the opportunity for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002625015
4 mai 2023