On 9 September 1999 the court held a hearing concerning that appeal. The applicant failed to attend that hearing. She submits that she was not informed about that hearing.

The court fixed a hearing for 19 April 2002. This hearing was adjourned because the applicant wished to retain a lawyer.

Krasnoyarsk, Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 17/11/2020 10/04/2020 17/11/2020 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

The hearing before the Audiencia provincial took place on 20 December 1995. The applicant asserts that at the beginning of the hearing, a few minutes after his counsel, Mr.

the hearing before the statutory time of summoning (Section 590 para. 2 CCP).

The applicant did not attend the hearing but his lawyer, the prosecutor and the victim were present.

During the appeal hearing, the applicant requested an adjournment because N.S., who was a material witness, was absent.

.) - 63343/00 Decision 6.11.2003 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Absence of personal notification of hearing in Constitutional Court proceedings: inadmissible The applicant

On 30 May 2017 the Ankara Regional Appeal Court carried out the appellate review without holding a hearing and without addressing the applicant’s request to that effect.

.) - 63151/00 Decision 14.2.2004 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Liechtenstein’s reservation concerning the right to a hearing and public pronouncement of judgment

Moreover, he requested that an oral hearing be held, although a hearing in these proceedings was excluded by law.

The applicant did not participate in the hearing, because his transfer was refused by the pre-trial detention center where the day of the hearing was a non-working day.

On 25 August 1994 and 25 January 1995 hearings were held.

  She claims that her request for a hearing was disregarded although it was submitted within the applicable time-limit.

    Proceedings concerning restoration of the heating supply 13.     In 1994 a housing maintenance company cut off the heating in the applicant's flat.

A new hearing on the merits was fixed for 16   October   2002. 23.

On 4 September 2002 the District Court held a preparatory hearing. According to the applicants, a second preparatory hearing was held on 12   February 2003.

  A hearing was initially scheduled for 27   November   2013, the date being subsequently declared non-working day (“Tree Day”) by the Government.

The applicant complains that the domestic courts unreasonably restricted his entitlement to a public hearing.

.) - 35115/97 Decision 15.6.2000 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Hearing held in prison: admissible The applicant is serving a prison sentence for murder and burglary