Nor did it appear that the impugned legislation had had an adverse impact on the business of the two banks.

had been forced to flee.

Moreover, she submitted that she and B had divorced and that she had been granted sole custody of A while B had limited visitation rights.

The first applicant had stated that he had been looking for a job and that he had wanted to go to Greece to work.

Z.D. had been the “hitman”, while An.Gub. and B.Sh. had undertaken surveillance and had helped Z.D. to escape in the ZAZ car.

claimed that she had been present during her father’s arrest and that she had witnessed violence towards her father, who had not put up any resistance to his arrest, which involved his being knocked to

Consequently, it had not refused the applicant leave to appeal because it had disagreed with the finding that she had been a victim of trafficking, but rather because it had found that at the time of the

She had not had any idea that the persons who had broken into her house were police officers; she had thought that she was being murdered.

The individual cell had had a window but no daylight had come through. There were only dirty bedclothes. There had also been a toilet which did not flush.

When the applicant had refused to undergo the test, V.T. had threatened him with arrest. The applicant had then given in and had been released only after undergoing the test.

When he had learnt that B.J. had left the ward, he had checked to make sure that the applicable regulations had been complied with, which – to his knowledge – they had been.

Indeed, during the criminal proceedings G. had testified, inter alia , that “at no time had the applicant stated that he had stolen the items from here or there, but he had mentioned that he had bought

who had never seen or examined the applicant and had recorded a diagnosis of schizophrenia which had no foundation in reality.

proceedings had been pending.

that it had had buildings on it.

the prison authorities; had been forced to eat complaints he had written about the colony; and, had had an Alsation dog set on him.

The questions in themselves had perhaps not enabled the applicant to understand the evidence against her, among everything that had been discussed during the trial, that had ultimately been taken into

It had been presumed that he had had to stay at the apartment. The officers had not let him out of their sight and had controlled his movements while inside.

It had not been shown that the applicant had had sufficient knowledge of his prosecution and of the charges against him in the present case.