CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0411DEC002106092

Admin. suprême

11 avril 1995

11 avril 1995

Having pleaded guilty to 24 separate counts of forgery, issuing false powers of attorney and obtaining money by false pretences, he was sentenced to six years' imprisonment.

Page 65 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009DEC004333518

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

focused on irregularities in the Swiss wine market and the case of Mr   D.G., a winemaker from the Canton of Valais, who had been accused of tax offences, fraud, unfair competition practices, forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC004522308

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

He was charged with fraud, forgery of documents and abuse of authority.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0207DEC002917202

Admin. suprême

7 février 2006

7 février 2006

an offence against K. alleging aggravated fraud, aggravated extortion ( kiristys, utpressning ), misuse of a position of trust ( luottamusaseman väärinkäyttö, missbruk av förtroendeställning ) and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1006REP001122484

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1987

6 octobre 1987

     The offences charged arose out of separate incidents involving the theft and forgery of cheques and investigations by two police forces.   41.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD003744497

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

On that day the applicant was arrested and charged with forgery. He was released after 48 hours.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0624JUD000172704

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2010

24 juin 2010

It charged A. with abuse of powers, excess of powers, forgery of documents, deliberately unlawful arrest. It further charged M. with excess of powers and deliberately unlawful arrest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1222JUD000596203

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2009

22 décembre 2009

    Criminal proceedings on the charges of fraud, money laundering, unlawful possession of ammunition and forgery of documents 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC005220414

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

He classified the offences under Article 337 §§ 1, 3 and 4 (abuse of power and authority) and Article 311 § 1 (forgery of documents) of the 1997 Criminal Code, and adjusted the text of the charges in line

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD002007704

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

The most important audio records were submitted to [forensic experts] who confirmed that the records did not show any signs of forgery or any other modifications made in the course of the recording or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD001603118

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

• Sufficiently expeditious criminal proceedings lasting more than five years, in light of particularly complex international and financial nature of charges involving money laundering and document forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618JUD003598902

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2009

18 juin 2009

Criminal proceedings were, however, instituted against Mr   P on suspicion of forgery of this invoice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518JUD006797201

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2004

18 mai 2004

He also repeated his request for a report by a handwriting expert and his statement concerning the possibility of lodging a complaint of forgery. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD003692507

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

An arrest warrant was issued in respect of the third and fourth suspects by the Morphou (“Güzelyurt”) District Court on the same day on suspicion of forgery of documents – specifically, providing falsified

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0424JUD001110584

Admin. suprême

24 avril 1990

24 avril 1990

   Mr Huvig was charged with tax evasion, forgery of private and business documents, failure to keep proper accounts, aiding and abetting misuse of company property and receiving funds derived

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC006555001

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

Furthermore, new charges of unlawful currency transactions, abuse of power and forgery committed by a public official were brought against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD000773906

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2009

30 juillet 2009

    Criminal proceedings on the charges of theft and forgery of documents 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513JUD001243222

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2025

13 mai 2025

State Attorney’s Office ( Općinsko državno odvjetništvo u Splitu ) indicted the applicant before the Split Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Splitu ) for the criminal offences of business fraud and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD003670516

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2023

20 juin 2023

The applicant was the third person mentioned in the announcement, which mentioned that the people described had been charged “with offences of fraud committed jointly, forgery and use of forged documents

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD003444705

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

Prosecutor I.S., without making any attempt to elucidate anything, found that no forgery had been committed. The prosecutor did not want to speak to us about it.

Source officielle