CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

50 002 résultats pour « Finet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13496

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2021

30 novembre 2021

of political protest: violation Facts – The applicants were convicted of hooliganism and fined for spray-painting a monument to “partisans” on the anniversary of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, in the

Source officielle

Page 65 sur 2501

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC000031908

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2011

13 septembre 2011

They were fined EUR 120 each. The Paderborn District Court upheld the fines by a judgment of 27   May   2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10855

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2016

5 janvier 2016

It was not based on restrictions specific to the press and the applicant was not fined for overstepping his journalistic duties and responsibilities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3819

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

Before that, the applicants had been fined under the criminal-law provisions prohibiting the organisation of religious meetings in premises not intended for such purpose.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC000375908

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2010

9 novembre 2010

On 2 June 2006 the Municipal Court issued an enforcement order whereby V.P. was given three additional days to comply with the applicant’s access rights or be fined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243896

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2025

28 mai 2025

Following M.M.’s private criminal action the applicant was found guilty of insult and fined approximately 430 euros (EUR).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD006699713

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2017

6 avril 2017

On 26 April and 31 May 2013 the bailiff fined him for his failure to take the child to the appointments scheduled on those two days. One of those fines was subsequently quashed in court. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1019DEC002613895

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

  The applicant was fined 300 Slovak crowns and ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings of 150 Slovak crowns.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527DEC005932916

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

He stated that it had been G.G. and the applicant who had become aggressive after the police officers had informed them about the fine.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233072

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2024

17 mars 2024

communicated on 17 March 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a traffic accident and the fairness of the ensuing misdemeanour proceedings in which the applicant was convicted and fined

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7846

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1997

20 octobre 1997

  Applicability of Article 6 § 1 Applicant could be considered the subject of a “charge” within autonomous meaning of Article 6 § 1 when he had been summoned to appear as a witness and fined for refusing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220732

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2022

11 octobre 2022

SECTION Application no. 22266/22 Lasha ZURABIANI against Georgia lodged on 28 April 2022 communicated on 11 October 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns   the imposition of a fine

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1205JUD005779215

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2017

5 décembre 2017

As noted in the appeal, BAM 10,000 is the maximum fine for contempt of court. The maximum fine should be imposed in the most serious cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0110DEC005030316

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2023

10 janvier 2023

The court therefore fined the applicant RON   5,000 (EUR   1,126). 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172193

Admin. suprême

21 février 2017

21 février 2017

and second-instance misdemeanor courts (in the first case, the competent bodies of the Ministry of Finance (see annex)) have found the applicants guilty of having committed administrative offences, fined

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150738

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2014

18 décembre 2014

The applicant lodged an appeal in cassation, claiming among other things, that he had already paid an administrative fine in connection with the same facts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186589

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2018

7 septembre 2018

(v)     Is the amount of the fine for violation of the Foreign Agents Act sufficiently foreseeable? (b)     Was the interference “necessary in a democratic society”?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC001221805

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

The money was confiscated and the applicant was fined 60 Moldovan lei (MDL).

Source officielle
CC

cr

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR01177

Cassation

24 mai 2018

24 mai 2018

Y..., âgé de 50 ans au moment des faits, avait noué une relation très ambiguë avec une fillette de 11 ans, rencontrée par hasard lors de ses déplacements à Moorea et avec laquelle il n'avait aucun lien

Source officielle
CC

cr

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR02207

Cassation

23 août 2017

23 août 2017

, multiples, auraient été commis entre 1989 et 1995 sur la personne de sa fille mineure, âgée alors de 4 à 10 ans sur la période concernée, le mis en examen profitant de l'absence de la mère de la fillette

Source officielle