:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

'; display:inline-block } .sF6C0A237 { width:18.49pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s194C3D2F { width:13.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s141CD980 { page-break-inside

font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4FB5D7A { height:25.65pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 7459/16 Ionuț PORUMBESCU against Romania

'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCA3CE78A { height:16.7pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 17837/16 Ionel ROSTAŞ against Romania and

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A.

'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 6738/16 Constantin VOINESCU against Romania and 19 other applications

1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s901B8D2A { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .s97296F0 { width:0.81pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 25392/20 Alexandru-Cătălin CALOTĂ against Romania and 24 other applications (

font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

Contentieux de la Protection JUGEMENT RÉPUTÉ CONTRADICTOIRE DU 14 Janvier 2025 DEMANDEUR(S) : Société CAISSE REGIONALE DE CREDIT AGRICOLE MUTUEL DE FRANCE dont le siège social est sis 1 rue Daniel

'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 44810/16 Costică STATE against Romania and 24 other applications (see appended table

vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

SYMPHONIE ON LINE 4 Avenue de l'Eglise Romane 33370 ARTIGUES PRES BORDEAUX représentée par Me Laurence COMBEDOUZON, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX ET INTIMÉE : Madame Sophie X... 18 avenue de la Branchoire

    The Romanian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.

    The Romanian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.