CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 348 résultats pour « Constance DAMAMME »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD002048907

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2017

6 juin 2017

    It has been the Court’s constant case-law that a period of detention will in principle be lawful if it is carried out pursuant to a court order.

Page 65 sur 118

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

    Damage 51.     The applicants claimed 8,000 euros (EUR) each in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 52.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0716DEC000280466

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 1968

16 juillet 1968

In the meanwhile, the hearing concerning the plaintiff's claim for damages had taken place before the Regional Court on 30th September, 1965.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7648

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2013

25 juillet 2013

Forms of economic activity were in constant development, and so were methods of tax evasion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC003949207

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2010

4 mai 2010

The assessor awarded GBP 115,000 in basic damages and GBP 172,000 in aggravated damages.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1047258-3021881

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

damage arising from the breach of Article 34 and an overall sum of EUR 14,000 for costs and expenses, less EUR 2,642.66 already received in legal aid.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC005597713

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

The plaintiffs alleged that the applicant was unconstitutional and sought to damage the free democratic basic order ( freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD000930216

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD007321901

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

The District Court held him liable to pay 2,500 Russian roubles compensation to each plaintiff in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003350104

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

    Mr V. then sued the applicant company and Ms L. for compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage and legal costs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD003942315

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

Lastly, the investigator noted that by making a statement during the internal investigation that he had ensured constant supervision of the detainees, D.M. had given false testimony.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC000152910

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2013

12 novembre 2013

The applicant sought damages for a breach of Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention. 27.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68144-68612

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2000

4 avril 2000

He was later replaced by Colin Sampson, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police. The final inquiry reports were submitted to the RUC and DPP on 23 March 1987.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0921JUD002617616

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2023

21 septembre 2023

end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1208925-1256571

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2004

2 décembre 2004

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded the applicant 5,000   euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,000 for costs and expenses.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2972927-3274231

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2009

22 décembre 2009

The Panel further dismissed the applicant’s claims about being denied medical assistance as both during his hunger strike and while in solitary confinement the applicant had been under the constant supervision

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC004326704

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

March 2001 the Social Security Board ( Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych – “the SSB”) granted the applicant the right to an early ‑ retirement pension for persons raising children who required constant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC003904110

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

It was further alleged in the petition that during their consultation in police custody, the lawyer had observed bruising around the applicant's eye and damage to his gums, which could have been a result

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:1004DEC000305967

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 1968

4 octobre 1968

follows:   (a) according to Section 6 of the Administration of Justice and Act 1933, libel actions have to be tried before a jury and no proper redress is obtainable as the court can only award damages

Source officielle
CA

CHAMBRE 2 SECTION 1

62cd0f03e91c8e9fcf071281

Appel

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

C'est dans ces conditions que par jugement du 14 janvier 2021, le tribunal judiciaire de Lille a': - constaté sa compétence pour l'examen de la demande en concurrence déloyale';' - débouté l'EARL du

Source officielle