CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD002048907
6 juin 2017
It has been the Court’s constant case-law that a period of detention will in principle be lawful if it is carried out pursuant to a court order.
Page 65 sur 118
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807
10 avril 2018
Damage 51. The applicants claimed 8,000 euros (EUR) each in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 52.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0716DEC000280466
16 juillet 1968
In the meanwhile, the hearing concerning the plaintiff's claim for damages had taken place before the Regional Court on 30th September, 1965.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7648
25 juillet 2013
Forms of economic activity were in constant development, and so were methods of tax evasion.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC003949207
4 mai 2010
The assessor awarded GBP 115,000 in basic damages and GBP 172,000 in aggravated damages.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1047258-3021881
8 juillet 2004
damage arising from the breach of Article 34 and an overall sum of EUR 14,000 for costs and expenses, less EUR 2,642.66 already received in legal aid.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC005597713
4 octobre 2016
The plaintiffs alleged that the applicant was unconstitutional and sought to damage the free democratic basic order ( freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD000930216
2 mars 2023
end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD007321901
6 décembre 2007
The District Court held him liable to pay 2,500 Russian roubles compensation to each plaintiff in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003350104
22 janvier 2013
Mr V. then sued the applicant company and Ms L. for compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage and legal costs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD003942315
29 janvier 2019
Lastly, the investigator noted that by making a statement during the internal investigation that he had ensured constant supervision of the detainees, D.M. had given false testimony.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC000152910
12 novembre 2013
The applicant sought damages for a breach of Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention. 27.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68144-68612
4 avril 2000
He was later replaced by Colin Sampson, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police. The final inquiry reports were submitted to the RUC and DPP on 23 March 1987.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0921JUD002617616
21 septembre 2023
ECLI:CEDH:003-1208925-1256571
2 décembre 2004
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded the applicant 5,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,000 for costs and expenses.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2972927-3274231
22 décembre 2009
The Panel further dismissed the applicant’s claims about being denied medical assistance as both during his hunger strike and while in solitary confinement the applicant had been under the constant supervision
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC004326704
10 septembre 2013
March 2001 the Social Security Board ( Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych – “the SSB”) granted the applicant the right to an early ‑ retirement pension for persons raising children who required constant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC003904110
6 septembre 2011
It was further alleged in the petition that during their consultation in police custody, the lawyer had observed bruising around the applicant's eye and damage to his gums, which could have been a result
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:1004DEC000305967
4 octobre 1968
follows: (a) according to Section 6 of the Administration of Justice and Act 1933, libel actions have to be tried before a jury and no proper redress is obtainable as the court can only award damages
CHAMBRE 2 SECTION 1
62cd0f03e91c8e9fcf071281
7 juillet 2022
C'est dans ces conditions que par jugement du 14 janvier 2021, le tribunal judiciaire de Lille a': - constaté sa compétence pour l'examen de la demande en concurrence déloyale';' - débouté l'EARL du