CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD000009912
3 novembre 2015
The expert Z.J. confirmed that M.O. had died because of hypothermia.
Page 65 sur 1499
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204JUD006324313
4 février 2021
All those decisions were set aside as premature by the Prymorskyy District Prosecutor’s Office of Odesa because of insufficiency of the search measures taken by the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD003081422
27 mai 2025
Because of her behavioural disturbances, she was admitted to the psychiatric ward of the hospital as an involuntary patient.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD005589610
11 mars 2021
91; (xi) 19/11/2012 – the investigator again terminated the criminal proceedings, because of the lack of constituent elements of a crime.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009
6 juillet 2021
His request was refused because parental leave could be granted to a policeman only if his children were left without maternal care. 9.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0714DEC001117084
14 juillet 1987
Insofar as they concerned the tasting procedure, they were irrelevant because the results of this procedure provided insufficient evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0403JUD003415004
3 avril 2008
as its owner, and because he had not brought a claim for inflation losses arising out of protracted enforcement of the judgments. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD000204703
5 octobre 2006
Enforcement proceedings were instituted but the judgment was not enforced because the Arkhangelsk Regional administration lacked necessary funds. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004353698
26 avril 2001
They were postponed either by reason of legitimate impediment of the applicant, or because of witnesses’ absence, or finally because of lawyer’s strikes.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC002132202
21 janvier 2003
On 19 March 1988 the liquidator asked the court to delay the proceedings because the matter was being examined by him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD003661905
12 janvier 2012
Out of forty-two scheduled hearings, six were adjourned at the applicant’s request or due to his failure to appear, five because of both parties’ failure to appear, three because of the non-appearance
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523DEC001311405
23 mai 2017
The applicant claimed that he had been punished for statements he had never technically made because the courts had confused his words with those of his co-defendant S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0909DEC003786914
9 septembre 2014
By the police decision dated 31 March 2008 they were discontinued because of formal defects at the commencement of the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC005433710
22 octobre 2013
First, the Government considered the application inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies because the applicant did not challenge the Czech Bar Association’s decision of 12 February 2010 by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC001395012
18 février 2014
a victim of trafficking without any protection and because she would be at real risk of ill ‑ treatment from her traffickers and their affiliates; the applicant had further complained that her
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158184
28 septembre 2015
The applicant argued that her application was justified because on 27 January 2014 the Warmińsko-Mazurski Governor refused to order expulsion of her youngest child and because, in separate proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD001376117
14 décembre 2021
The applicant complained before the Court that he was denied access to a court because his claims were never considered on the merits by administrative courts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709DEC003698211
9 juillet 2013
For the same reasons, namely only because of the lack of legal provision and therefore the opportunity for the applicant to enter into a registered life partnership, and not because of her inability to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC003996403
28 septembre 2010
In a judgment of 19 February 2002 the Varna Court of Appeal found against the applicant and upheld the lower court's findings that he had no right of action under the SRDA because the liability of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-126612
5 septembre 2013
He maintained that he had fled his home country Syria because he had been persecuted, detained and tortured there.