CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD000009912

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

The expert Z.J. confirmed that M.O. had died because of hypothermia.

Source officielle

Page 65 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204JUD006324313

Admin. suprême

4 février 2021

4 février 2021

All those decisions were set aside as premature by the Prymorskyy District Prosecutor’s Office of Odesa because of insufficiency of the search measures taken by the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD003081422

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2025

27 mai 2025

Because of her behavioural disturbances, she was admitted to the psychiatric ward of the hospital as an involuntary patient.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD005589610

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

  91; (xi)   19/11/2012 – the investigator again terminated the criminal proceedings, because of the lack of constituent elements of a crime.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

His request was refused because parental leave could be granted to a policeman only if his children were left without maternal care. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0714DEC001117084

Admin. suprême

14 juillet 1987

14 juillet 1987

  Insofar as they concerned the tasting procedure, they were irrelevant because the results of this procedure provided insufficient evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0403JUD003415004

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2008

3 avril 2008

as its owner, and because he had not brought a claim for inflation losses arising out of protracted enforcement of the judgments. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD000204703

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

    Enforcement proceedings were instituted but the judgment was not enforced because the Arkhangelsk Regional administration lacked necessary funds. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0426JUD004353698

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2001

26 avril 2001

They were postponed either by reason of legitimate impediment of the applicant, or because of witnesses’ absence, or finally because of lawyer’s strikes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC002132202

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

On 19 March 1988 the liquidator asked the court to delay the proceedings because the matter was being examined by him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD003661905

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2012

12 janvier 2012

Out of forty-two scheduled hearings, six were adjourned at the applicant’s request or due to his failure to appear, five because of both parties’ failure to appear, three because of the non-appearance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523DEC001311405

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2017

23 mai 2017

The applicant claimed that he had been punished for statements he had never technically made because the courts had confused his words with those of his co-defendant S.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0909DEC003786914

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2014

9 septembre 2014

By the police decision dated 31 March 2008 they were discontinued because of formal defects at the commencement of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC005433710

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

First, the Government considered the application inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies because the applicant did not challenge the Czech Bar Association’s decision of 12 February 2010 by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC001395012

Admin. suprême

18 février 2014

18 février 2014

a victim of trafficking without any protection and because she would be at real risk of ill ‑ treatment from her traffickers and their affiliates; the applicant had further complained that her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158184

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2015

28 septembre 2015

The applicant argued that her application was justified because on 27   January 2014 the Warmińsko-Mazurski Governor refused to order expulsion of her youngest child and because, in separate proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD001376117

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

    The applicant complained before the Court that he was denied access to a court because his claims were never considered on the merits by administrative courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709DEC003698211

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

For the same reasons, namely only because of the lack of legal provision and therefore the opportunity for the applicant to enter into a registered life partnership, and not because of her inability to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC003996403

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

In a judgment of 19 February 2002 the Varna Court of Appeal found against the applicant and upheld the lower court's findings that he had no right of action under the SRDA because the liability of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126612

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2013

5 septembre 2013

He maintained that he had fled his home country Syria because he had been persecuted, detained and tortured there.

Source officielle