THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicants were born in 1971 and 1976 and are detained in Lipcani. 6.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the criminal proceedings against him had not been fair in so far as he had been convicted without evidence being heard directly from him or the

In the Constitutional Court’s view, the fact that the applicant was ultimately dismissed on 4 July 2005, instead of on 26   May 2003, was only in the applicant’s favour, and that fact alone could

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicants complained that the interference caused by the retrospective application of Law no. 183/2010 to pending proceedings had affected their right to a fair hearing under Article

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS 3.     The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 4.

The applicant complained of a breach of his right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Article   6 § 1 of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1947 and lives in Lyubeshiv. The applicant was represented by Mr V.   Yelov, a lawyer practising in Lutsk. 3.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

The amounts were subsequently reduced by 25% in the light of the fact that negligence on the part of R.M. had been a contributing factor in the accident. 4.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1986 and lives in Klagenfurt, Austria.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the application are set out in the appended table. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 4.

Relying on essentially the same facts, they also allege violations of their right to a fair trial, their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, and violations of the prohibition on discrimination