The list of the eighteen individuals concerned was made public by the Administration of the President of the United States. 17.

  Khrus (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.   47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 17.

It thus considers that Mr   Navalnyy’s remaining complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

    Notwithstanding the above conclusion, the Court recalls the stipulations made in paragraph 222 of the decision Beshiri and Others , cited above, regarding the conditions which the authorities

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 7.

EXPOSÉ DU LITIGE La société Vives Eaux exerce des activités de mareyage, de commerce de gros de produits de marée ou d'eaux douces.

The Government submitted that the applicant’s friend K.A. was not asked to show his identity documents since he had not made any comments to the police. 10.

It concludes that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see, among other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

The same was valid for the alternative request made by the applicants for other appropriate and equally effective measures, which also lacked substantiation.

previously taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

xa0;   Once the convictions in Spain had become final by decision of 7 March 2006, the Audiencia Nacional noted that the chronological links between the offences of which she had been convicted made

applicants finding themselves in a similar situation – i.e. where the complaint concerns past correctional detention in conditions in breach of the applicable domestic standards – are also expected to first make

Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters drafted by the Venice Commission provides for somewhat more detailed standards [CDL-AD (2002) 23,      § l.1.1.d.v]: ‘i. provision may be made

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Croatian nationals, Ms Draginja Treskavica (“the first applicant”), Ms Nataša Treskavica (“the second applicant”) and Ms Valentina