Its capital, though stemming from public means, is no longer held by the State. The applicant finances its activities from programme fees which it can fix itself.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Article 8 – A mother’s desire to visit her son who is being held prisoner does indeed fall within the scope of Article 8.

At the hearing the applicant challenged the conformity of the Appeals Board proceedings with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, complaining in particular that hearings were not held in public.

It also found that the bank itself could not be held liable for paying back the applicants’ money since that money had not been transferred to its balance sheet and held that only the convicted persons

  The Court held by 11 votes to six that it was unable to take cognisance of the merits of the application as it fell outside the Court’s temporal jurisdiction.

    There has therefore been a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention under this head. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION   20.

Neither the applicant nor his representative attended the hearing which was held before the Bergama Assize Court on 5 March 1999.

Accordingly, on the basis of equity, it awards him EUR   15,000 under this head. B.     Costs and expenses 38.

They were reports of interviews with four of the suspects who were held in Morocco.

In the light of that consideration the Court cannot accept the sum offered then as a starting point.

It accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Persons against whom a detention on remand order is issued shall be held in pre-trial detention centres.” 68.

    On 14 September 1998 the Disciplinary Council held a hearing.

The Chervonozavodsky Court held that there was no proof that the Ministry owned the impugned aircraft.

In addition, the deputy head indicated that the time-limit for the delivery of letters by ordinary post within Kyiv was three days.

By letter of 24 April 2012, the deputy head of the Sverdlovsk division of the Consumer Protection Authority forwarded the materials concerning the applicant’s diagnosis to the head of the Federal Consumer

was brought before the Court by the Commission on 16 February 1990;        Whereas in its judgment of 19 February 1991 the Court unanimously:        - held

damage sustained;        - held that the respondent state was to pay to the applicant, within three months, 11 546 310 Italian lire for costs and expenses;